[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: List scope
-
To: tesla@grendel.objinc.com, KLINEDA@univscvm.csd.scarolina.edu, QUANTUM@univscvm.csd.scarolina.edu, WMEYER@scientia.up.ac.za, bhaley@shore.net, coco@astroman.com, frerichs@zfe.siemens.de, froula@cig.mot.com, haba@snakemail.hut.fi, jetter@ix.netcom.com
-
Subject: Re: List scope
-
From: Esondrmn@aol.com
-
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 15:45:21 -0500
-
>Received: from mail06.mail.aol.com (mail06.mail.aol.com [152.163.172.108]) by uucp-1.csn.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id NAA25562 for <tesla@grendel.objinc.com>; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 13:51:56 -0700
In a message dated 96-01-24 11:45:56 EST, tesla@grendel.objinc.com writes:
>To: tesla@grendel.objinc.com
>Subject: List scope
>
>Re: Scope of this list
>Chip: You set the rules and we'll follow them, of course. To
>me sparks are sparks and HV is HV, and most of the guys I know
>personally who have built or are building TC's also have done
>work with various forms of electrostatic generators, so it
>seemed to me to be a legitimate subject for discussion. Have no
>idea what it means to have this extra traffic on the list, but
>would be interested in your views as a guide as to what is and
>what is not extraneous noise.
>Best regards,
>Ed Phillips
>
>[ Ed,
>
>Perhaps now is a good time to open public discussion on the desired scope
>of this list. It appears that there are more than a few people interested
in
>HV. I like to think of myself as being reasonable and open to suggestion.
>However, I also do not want to have the list decay into something that ends
>up wasting people's time with discussions on topics that are not related to
>the list that they signed up for.
>
>So, the question goes out to the list members. What is the general
>consensus?
>
>
>Chip ]
>
>
Chip,
My opinion, anything related to Tesla or any of his work. Also various high
voltage devices and discussions. I agree, most of us have probably built (
or would like to build) other devises such at Van de Graff generators.
There certainly is a lot of discussion on this list that I am not interested
in.
Ed Sonderman