[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: List scope
-
To: tesla@grendel.objinc.com, EricMT1496@aol.com, GBaddele@vitgssw.ms-mail.telecom.com.au, efreet@thelair.zynet.com, gary.peterson@modemnet.com, jbb@airmail.net, jdf149@psu.edu, kbarton@cwis.unomaha.edu, kcravens@sound.net, pxeyoung@mailbox.uq.oz.au, reking1@ix4.ix.netcom.com, rmr@christa.unh.edu, wesb@vnet.ibm.com
-
Subject: Re: List scope
-
From: Marcus Young <E.Young@mailbox.uq.oz.au>
-
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 04:34:41 -0600
-
>Received: from dingo.cc.uq.oz.au (root@dingo.cc.uq.oz.au [130.102.2.14]) by uucp-1.csn.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA15439 for <tesla@grendel.objinc.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 1996 11:46:42 -0700
>On the subject of the scope of this tesla list; I have to concur with the
majority. Let's keep
>the Telsa list a Tesla list. I find the discussion of other subjects and
HV in general
>interesting, but we must keep within the bounds of the list, which is
Nikola Tesla and his
>inventions.
>
>Getting off the subject is like going to a meeting that won't keep to its
agenda. It gets
>annoying and wastes time, which I must conserve anyway. I must admit that
I too have "drifted"
>off the subject too, and recently I might add. It is all too easy to drift
into a "fringe" area.
> I am glad to see that Chip has brought this up again. It gave me a good
kick in the pants to
>remind me of the purpose of this list.
>
>Everyone here knew what the list was about when they subscribed. In
admitting that, we also
>admit that we already agreed to stay within the bounds of discussion of
Nikola Tesla and his
>inventions. Even then, the area is quite large considering the number of
his inventions.
>Remember, all that is HV is not Tesla.
I agree with Scott. At least keep it 'Tesla' stuff here. There are mailing lists
for 'unproven' physics. I must agree that when I signed up, I was interested
in all things Tesla..........but the topic DOES seem to be drifting.
Thats my vote too.
ps. Van De Graph, 0 point E ect, just dont = TESLA!