[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Secondary Winding Done
-
To: tesla@grendel.objinc.com, Esondrmn@aol.com, KLINEDA@UNIVSCVM.CSD.SCAROLINA.EDU, QUANTUM@UNIVSCVM.CSD.SCAROLINA.EDU, WMEYER@scientia.up.ac.za, bhaley@shore.net, brad.alheim@the-spa.com, frerichs@zfe.siemens.de, froula@cig.mot.com, haba@snakemail.hut.fi, scott@csustan.csustan.edu, stegmann@michelob.wustl.edu, wl-josh-tw@society.com, wsbusr3@urc.tue.nl
-
Subject: Re: Secondary Winding Done
-
From: coco@astroman.com
-
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 12:46:55 -0500
-
>Received: from borg.mindspring.com (root@borg.mindspring.com [204.180.128.14]) by uucp-1.csn.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id JAA14196 for <tesla@grendel.objinc.com>; Thu, 15 Feb 1996 09:46:32 -0700
>Don,
>Before getting started on your gaps, it would be worth your while
>to look into a vaccuume gap type arrangement. Richard Q's video
>shows considerable gains to be had with a V-gap system. I have
>done some experiments with the V-gap and certainly agree that
>performance is improved with this type of arrangement. Quenching
>the arc and pulling the ionized air away is the key to good gaps.
>I can forward you a scan of Scotty's vaccuume gap if you like.
>The picture is pretty much self explainatory. I have not done
>any posting of scans to the group here because I am limited to
>how much data I can import into the body of a message (and multi
>part postings are a drag). I can send you the scan as an attachment
>if you have the capability for that type of messaging.
>
>Glenn
Glenn,...I would appreciate a copy as well, if possible
You can send as an attactment too this address:
coco@astroman.com
Thanks
Robert D.