[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: List scope
-
To: tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com, KLINEDA-at-univscvm.csd.scarolina.edu, QUANTUM-at-univscvm.csd.scarolina.edu, WMEYER-at-scientia.up.ac.za, bhaley-at-shore-dot-net, coco-at-astroman-dot-com, frerichs-at-zfe.siemens.de, froula-at-cig.mot-dot-com, haba-at-snakemail.hut.fi, jetter-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com
-
Subject: Re: List scope
-
From: Esondrmn-at-aol-dot-com
-
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 1996 12:02:11 -0500
-
>Received: from mail06.mail.aol-dot-com (mail06.mail.aol-dot-com [152.163.172.108]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id KAA28719 for <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>; Thu, 25 Jan 1996 10:09:07 -0700
In a message dated 96-01-24 14:10:16 EST, tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com writes:
>
>Well, I have great interest in ANYTHING which will produce large sparks, be
>it
>VDG's, Wimshursts, or TCs. So far I have had the best results with the TCs.
>I don't think the list should be closed to any kind of HV discussion.
>
>One thing that does bug me is all this conspiracy/death ray etc stuff which
>seems to dog the other list. I think Chip's list has managed to stay fairly
>free of that. Also - I hate the one line replies which don't appear to have
>any relevance to anyone other than maybe one person on the list!
>
>Cheers
>Phil Mason
>
>
Phil,
Well stated. I agree with everything you said. Maybe I should unsuscribe to
the USA-Tesla list.
Ed Sonderman