Re: The Next Coil

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Re: The Next Coil
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 22:54:34 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	FutureT-at-aol-dot-com[SMTP:FutureT-at-aol-dot-com]
Sent: 	Monday, August 04, 1997 8:08 AM
To: 	tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: 	Re: The Next Coil

In a message dated 97-08-03 15:50:19 EDT, you write:

<< 
> The reactive current in the (7.5nF) coupling cap will be very different
> than the base current in the dividing chain, so the coupling cap would
> probably have to be considered separately.  Perhaps the tap point could
> be chosen to compensate for this?
 
>  -GL
  >>

Greg,

I just meant the idea of putting the caps inside the secondary, but 
meant to keep the divider, and the coupling cap separate, I should
have been more clear.  But interesting idea about a compensating
tap point!

John Freau

• Prev: Re: Rotary Gap - pulley
• Next: An Important Post.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread