Re: Gap Losses

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Re: Gap Losses
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 21:56:19 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	richard hull[SMTP:rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net]
Sent: 	Wednesday, August 27, 1997 1:21 PM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re:  Gap Losses

At 11:01 PM 8/26/97 -0500, you wrote:
>
>From: 	Greg Leyh[SMTP:lod-at-pacbell-dot-net]
>Sent: 	Tuesday, August 26, 1997 2:27 AM
>To: 	Tesla List
>Subject: 	Re:  Gap Losses
>
>Richard Hull wrote:
>
>
>> As regards what is the optimum surge impedance..... I honestly believe it is
>> like everything else in this messy business...firmly planted in ever
>> shifting sand.
>> 
>> It is part of the art.
>> 
>> A question to your question what is really high? ...Low?  It is as much
>> power related (relates to frequency too) as to some magic number. You
>> effectively said this earlier.
>
>In your travels, have you ever come across any mention of actual resistance
>msmts made on a TC rotary gap?
>
>
>-GL

Greg,  

No, interestingly enough I have not.  I have worked a little with static
gaps but haven't tried a study of a rotary gap's actual firing resistance.
But then, again, I haven't used a single lone two or four gap rotary in a
system in years.
Might have to look into that.

Richard Hull, TCBOR
>
>
>
>
>

• Prev: Re: Static Air-blast gap.
• Next: Re: Rochester T'Thon (Wish you were here...)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread