[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Gap Losses
From: richard hull[SMTP:rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 1997 7:06 PM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: Gap Losses
At 01:21 AM 8/28/97 -0500, you wrote:
>
>From: Greg Leyh[SMTP:lod-at-pacbell-dot-net]
>Sent: Thursday, August 28, 1997 1:39 AM
>To: Tesla List
>Subject: Re: Gap Losses
>
>Richard Hull wrote:
>
>
>> Probably, it is more of safe range for someone wanting a quick and dirty
>> generalization that won't get them in trouble when designing and building an
>> important system which has got to work out of the chute. Ideally, of
>> course, tweaking and dinkin' with the system after construction will improve
>> the performance. (perhaps by even adding or subtracting gaps!)
>
Greg wrote;
>At this point, I am definitely doing everything possible from the 'armchair'
>point of view so that the coil might work 'out of the chute', since even the
>simplest jobs, like changing the toroid, will require renting construction
>equipment a week in advance.
>
>
>-GL
>
>
Yes. I keep forgetting the tonnage involved in your system! Definitely
out of the chute excellence would be highly desirable. Dinkin' around over
10KW can be like Russian Roulette.
Richard Hull, TCBOR