[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: More on Top Toroid



> Date:          Tue, 4 Feb 1997 22:26:09 -0700
> From:          Tesla List <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
> To:            Tesla-list-subscribers-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com
> Subject:       Re: More on Top Toroid
> Reply-to:      tesla-at-pupman-dot-com

> > Subject: Re: More on Top Toroid
> > > Subject: More on Top Toroid
> > Subject: Re: More on Top Toroid
> > > Subject: More on Top Toroid
> 
> Subscriber: tom_mcgahee-at-sigmais-dot-com Tue Feb  4 22:13:07 1997
> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 09:23:37 -0500
> From: Thomas McGahee <tom_mcgahee-at-sigmais-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: More on Top Toroid
> 
>     [The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set]
>     [Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set]
>     [Some characters may be displayed incorrectly]
> 
> 
> 
> ----------
> > From: Tesla List <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
> > To: Tesla-list-subscribers-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com
> > Subject: Re: More on Top Toroid
> > Date: Tuesday, February 04, 1997 12:25 AM
> > 
> > > Subject: More on Top Toroid
> > 
> > Subscriber: bert.hickman-at-aquila-dot-com Mon Feb  3 21:53:22 1997
> > Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1997 11:43:33 -0800
> > From: Bert Hickman <bert.hickman-at-aquila-dot-com>
> > To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> > Subject: Re: More on Top Toroid
> > 
> > Tesla List wrote:
> > > 
> > > Subscriber: jd231825-at-engr.colostate.edu Sun Feb  2 17:41:41 1997
> > > Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 10:00:15 -0700
> > > From: Jeff Detweiler <jd231825-at-engr.colostate.edu>
> > > To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> > > Subject: More on Top Toroid
> > > 
> > > Greetings everyone,
> > > 
> > > I really appreciate all the informative replies to my original posting.
> > > Just a small clarification though--must the center of the toroid be a
> > > conducting material also? I would think so for best electrostatic
> > > shielding, but this would make "toroid" a bit of a misnomer since the
> > > center is not really open in the sense of it being air or at least some
> > > nonconducting material. In other words:
> > > 
> > > /\_______/\ (toroid side view: plate in middle is conducting also?)
> > > \/  | |  \/
> > >     | |
> > >     | | (coil secondary)
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jeff
> > 
> > Jeff,
> > 
> > It doesn't HAVE to be, but it's often more convenient to make the center
> > out of conductive material, like a pair of pie-pans or pizza pans. 
> > 
> > -- Bert --
> 
> Jeff,
> The inside area of the Toroid is almost entirely shielded by the rest of
> the Toroid. That is why you don't normally see any sparks breaking out from
> there! So, there is nothing wrong with using metal for the inner piece. I
> would stick to thin aluminum, though, as ferromagnetic materials would
> create inductive problems. I have noticed that some people use wood or
> plastic and then cover it with aluminum foil to make it conducting. The
> inner section serves two distinct purposes. One of them is to support the
> wight of the Toroid, and the other is to connect the secondary to the
> toroid. I have seen commercial toroids that used four metal bars to provide
> both functions. I honestly don't think it makes much difference, since the
> area inside the toroid is so well shielded!
> 
> Fr. Tom McGahee

Fr. Tom, All,

I have employed the mild steel lid from a 55 US gallon oil drum on my 
MTC system as the centerpiece for the 12 X48 inch OD toroid 
without trouble.  Earlier smaller toroids on this same system were 
smaller mild steel covers for those military green reuseable cans 
that all the neat (and not so neat) government NATO surplus comes in. 
 In all cases however there was a shorted 3 inch cross sectional 
solid aluminum toroid closer to the top turn of the secondary than 
this iron sheet.  FWIW.

rwstephens