[Fwd: coupling]

• To: tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com
• Subject: [Fwd: coupling]
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 00:08:13 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

Subject:  [Fwd: coupling]
  Date:   Thu, 15 May 1997 14:18:50 -0400
  From:   chuck seguin <seguinc-at-algonquinc.on.ca>
    To:   Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>


Tesla List wrote:
> 
> Subject:   coupling
>   Date:    Thu, 01 May 1997 16:39:42 -0400
>   From:    chuck seguin <seguinc-at-algonquinc.on.ca>
>     To:    Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
>I'll send this one out again.  I was looking for a little more response from people on the list.  Thanks to 
the one that answered.  I understand this may have been dealt with
already, but I would appreciate if others 
could pitch in.

Thank you all in advance.

Chuck

> Good afternoon,
> 
> I understand this next question was already answered by Richard Hull.  I
> would like, if possible, a more
> detailed explanation.
> 
> Why do TC builders, in general, lift the secondary out from the
> primary?  Actually, why move the secondary at
> all to change the coupling?  Would it make sense to move the primary
> instead?  It seems easier to perform.
> 
> Next, how does one begin to tune a TC, and what do we look for when
> doing it?  Please be as detailed as
> possible so that I may take notes and compare with my method.
> 
> Thanks to all that will help.
> 
> Chuck

• Prev: Re: Reduceing noise
• Next: Tube CX1140
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread