[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: 100 meter sparks - 'Prodical Genius' book tells otherwi




From: 	richard hull[SMTP:rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net]
Sent: 	Sunday, November 02, 1997 4:26 AM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re: 100 meter sparks - 'Prodical Genius' book tells otherwi

At 12:35 AM 11/1/97 -0600, you wrote:
>
>From: 	John H. Couture[SMTP:couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net]
>Sent: 	Friday, October 31, 1997 7:08 PM
>To: 	Tesla List
>Subject: 	Re: 100 meter sparks - 'Prodical Genius' book tells otherwi
>
>At 05:22 AM 10/30/97 +0000, you wrote:
>>
>>From: 	richard hull[SMTP:rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net]
>>Sent: 	Wednesday, October 29, 1997 5:47 PM
>>To: 	Tesla List
>>Subject: 	Re: 100 meter sparks - 'Prodical Genius' book tells otherwi
>>
>>
>
>>For convenience we Tesla coilers have set a sort of defacto standard for arc
>>measurement.  This is to generally adopt the shortest straight line path for
>>an arc from point of emission to the farthest point of contact or touch
>>down.  This is the proper way to describe sparks from a coil.  Most of
>>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  Richard -
> 
>  Note that this is not the proper way to describe sparks from a coil if you
>are going to determine the overall efficiency of a Tesla coil. The
>efficiency of a TC is the energy output divided by the input. The energy in
>this type of spark cannot be determined because it ignores the time involved
>in creating the spark. Energy is the product of watts and time. How would
>you test for the time of a point to point or wavy spark to establish the
>energy of the spark ? The controlled spark length solves this problem.
>
>  How do you define arc and spark ?
>
>  John Couture 
>
>
>John,

Spark and arc are the same in the casual sense to me!  An arc I generally
consider a drawn item with a beginning- origin, and an end to complete the
circuit (ground or groudish).  A spark I normally think of as a disappated
arc ending in air.

If a coil is adjudicated to be 96% efficient using your method and produces
an ARC of 6 feet with 10KW input.... and another deemed only 60% efficient
hits 10 feet with the same input energy, then give me the 60% unit.  I am
not powering anything up off these systems!  I am not looking to cohere the
zero point energy and create a new energy source.  I am looking to burn
whatever of the last remaining fossil fuels to create the longest arc
possible!  (Greenpeace forgive me for I no not what I do!)  I want the
visual impression of longest drawn arcs for my kilowatt hour!  This may or
may not be, for any specific coil, the highest efficiency use of input
energy......I accept that readily.

A good coil which is constructed by the artful hand gives good sparks for a
given energy and this is recognized by most observers (defacto) with the
only instrumentation being an AC ammeter and voltmeter on the mains input
regardless of phase angle.

Richard Hull, TCBOR

>