Re: Hi Q Quest (was sync TC latest resul

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Re: Hi Q Quest (was sync TC latest resul
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 16:54:38 -0600
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From:	FutureT-at-aol-dot-com [SMTP:FutureT-at-aol-dot-com]
Sent:	Tuesday, November 11, 1997 10:48 AM
To:	tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject:	Re: Hi Q Quest (was sync TC latest resul

In a message dated 97-11-11 10:02:10 EST, you write:

<< 
> ----->The Xc loading is different for the different frequencies
>          is it not?  What if you made the 17" coil a little longer to
>         get the frequency down to 80 kHz (with the same top load)
 >         and then did the comparison?
 
 >                         Barry

Barry,

It would seem that the freq. and L values I posted in original post
were incorrect;  correct freq of the 4 1/4" by 23" coil is 135kHz,
L = 44mH.   Sorry for the confustion.  See my other post to you 
also.

John Freau
  >>

• Prev: Re: Hi Q Quest (was sync TC latest results)
• Next: Re: Plasma, IS IT FLAMMABLE
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread