[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Modeling a magnifier
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@pupman.com>
-
Subject: Modeling a magnifier
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 20:10:31 -0600
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
----------
From: FutureT@aol.com [SMTP:FutureT@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 1998 10:06 AM
To: tesla@pupman.com
Subject: Re: Modeling a magnifier
In a message dated 98-02-24 05:13:18 EST, you write:
<< snip>
> For example: If the inductance of the third coil (L3) is three times the
> inductance of the transformer secondary (L2') (reasonable?):
> k=k'/2
> A magnifier with k'=0.6 would be equivalent to a conventional coil with
> k=0.3, what still requires very fast quenching for optimal operation
> (about 3 cycles of the resonant frequency), and could have serious
insulation
> problems. >snip>
Antonio,
In the measurements and observations that I did of the beats, the
beats corresponded to the k value between the primary and secondary
exactly. For instance if the k between pri and sec was .4, and the
"combined" (sec and resonator in the manner you suggest ) k was .2,
the beats were such that they agreed with a k of .4, which shows
that the system (as far as k is concerned) behaves as if the primary
was coupled only to the secondary, which apparently it is.
John Freau