[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Re: 30 9 mil gaps, great quenching (fwd)
-
To: tesla@pupman.com
-
Subject: Re: Re: 30 9 mil gaps, great quenching (fwd)
-
From: Tesla List <mod1@pupman.com>
-
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 22:06:55 -0600 (MDT)
-
Approved: mod1@pupman.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 18:51:50 -0600
From: terryf@verinet.com
To: Tesla List <tesla@pupman.com>
Subject: Re: Re: 30 9 mil gaps, great quenching (fwd)
Hi Eric,
Thanks for confirming the gap design! I was waiting for someone to
independently test it out. I wonder if 9 mils is better than the 4 I use.
My 4 mil gap performs better than my 7 mil gap. I think you have also
confirmed how cool it runs if the quenching is correct. I have never tried
fan cooling. Perhaps it will help too by blowing away ionized gasses, The
gap should stay cool by itself.
Great work!
Terry Fritz
At 12:08 PM 7/17/98 -0600, you wrote:
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 13:57:28 EDT
>From: ESchulz531@aol.com
>To: tesla@pupman.com
>Subject: Re: Re: 30 9 mil gaps, great quenching (fwd)
>
>Hi,
> I was originally using 6 gaps each 25 mils in the RQ gap at 15KV. I think it
>would have worked better if I had a stronger vacuum cleaner. With my new 30 9
>mil gap I was using 16 of them at 15KV. I also had first notch quenching at
>10 gaps with about 10.6 kV. The copper barley gets warm to the touch.
>Sometime today or tomorrow I will increase the power and add a fan for air
>flow through the primary gap. I built my 30 gaps in two rows like Terry did.
>It makes for easy adjustment.
>
>Erik Schulz
>
>