[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@pupman.com>
-
Subject: magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 16:34:23 -0600
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
----------
From: Malcolm Watts [SMTP:MALCOLM@directorate.wnp.ac.nz]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 1998 2:49 PM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)
> ----------
> From: Antonio C. M. de Queiroz [SMTP:acmq@compuland.com.br]
> Sent: Sunday, March 22, 1998 1:02 AM
> To: Tesla List
> Subject: Re: magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)
>
> Malcolm Watts wrote:
>
> > I am personally happy with the results I've obtained. As I say, k for
> > my driver was somewhere between 0.4 and 0.5 and I obtained overall
> > k with unequivocal resolution from the scope of less that 0.1. In fact
> > I have the first piccies of the traces back now. I will scope the
> > same driver with different primaries and different resonators at some
> > stage.
>
> Precise descriptions of the characteristics of the system (Ls, Cs, k),
> of how the measurements were made, and the pictures would be of great
> value for the understanding of the magnifier operation.
> Will you make these pictures avaliable?
>
> Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz
> http://www.coe.ufrj.br/~acmq
Of course. I have your postal address somewhere. Give me a couple of
weeks. I am very short of money right now.
Malcolm