[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Coilforms, sealants/glyptal (fwd)
-
To: tesla@pupman.com
-
Subject: Re: Coilforms, sealants/glyptal (fwd)
-
From: Tesla List <mod1@pupman.com>
-
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 1998 21:34:59 -0600 (MDT)
-
Approved: mod1@pupman.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 1998 12:47:47 -0500
From: Adam Parker <park_e_r@hiwaay.net>
To: Tesla List <tesla@pupman.com>
Subject: Re: Coilforms, sealants/glyptal (fwd)
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Sat, 11 Jul 1998 00:59:35 -0400
>From: Richard Hull <rhull@richmond.infi.net>
>To: Tesla List <tesla@pupman.com>
>Subject: Re: Coilforms, sealants/glyptal (fwd)
>
>
>
>I would never personally use glyptal in or around any Tesla coil system.
It used to
>be used in a number of ways where a moisture resisitant and low vapor
pressure seal
>was needed. It also has a decent high voltage stand off value. I just
don't glop
>stuff on coils anymore.
>
>Richard Hull., TCBOR
Is there any particular reason you don't use any sealers, "glop", etc. or
is that just preference?
Adam