[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Solid state Secondary
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@pupman.com>
-
Subject: Re: Solid state Secondary
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 19:03:42 -0600
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
From: Harri Suomalainen[SMTP:haba@cc.hut.fi]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 1998 9:02 AM
To: tesla@pupman.com
Subject: Re: Solid state Secondary
>> Bylund also gives the equation for output voltage
>>
>> Vout = Vin / R * sqrt(L / C)
ie. Vout = Vin * Q
>> Thus like you I chose to maximise L and minimise R.
ie. maximize Q.
>> But Bylund also comments that the losses in the coil
>> are as nothing compared to Corona losses -
>>
>> My question is this could we do just as well winding
>> 2000 turns of 32 guage wire onto a 4" drain pipe or
>> whatever gives the same inductance.
You may try out transmission like theory based calculations. Too
lossy system will not
put out a lot of voltage according to calculations done like
described in "Vacuum tube
Tesla coils".
I guess Bylan is making an assumption that power is dissipated in
corona immediately
or something as absurd. The power in a solid state coil with a top
capasitance is actually
circulated in the coil for a while before the breakdown occurs, I
think.
Anyway, I'll not take what Bylan says granted. His design was so
poor, he suggested
an optinum system being a huge coil made of thin wire with almost no
top load etc.
I guess that's the only way that poor system did not break down. He
was happy to see
the system used for several minutes per run! I think his article in
Radio Electronics is
mostly crap and erratic as usual for Dylan's designs published in
that paper.
--
Harri Suomalainen
mailto:haba@cc.hut.fi