[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@pupman.com>
-
Subject: magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 23:37:37 -0600
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
----------
From: Malcolm Watts [SMTP:MALCOLM@directorate.wnp.ac.nz]
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 1998 3:21 PM
To: tesla@pupman.com
Subject: Re: magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)
<snip>
> Did you mention the inductance values you used in your tests, I don't
> seem to remember seeing them? The inductance ratio made a big
> difference in my tests, but now I'm seeing still new factors which I've
> described in another posting.
>
> John Freau
I did. The tertiary was somewhere around 5mH, the secondary about
350uH and the primary around 8mH. I agree the inductance ratio will
make a big difference.
***** That should of course be Lp = 8uH. Sorry all :(
Malcolm