[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
secondary wire
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@pupman.com>
-
Subject: secondary wire
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 08:02:12 -0500
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
----------
From: D.C. Cox [SMTP:DR.RESONANCE@next-wave.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 1998 1:46 AM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: secondary wire
to: Eli & Harold
Stranded wire is actually better than solid wire for a Q standpoint. Would
suggest a 22 x 6 inch sec on 6 inch dia PVC tube with a 12 x 3 toroid.
Drive with a 60 ma NST at 12 kV and use a .01 MFD cap. Use a synchro RSG
1800 rpm with 4 electrodes. Portable, compact, and 18-22 inch sparks.
DR.RESONANCE@next-wave.net
----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla@pupman.com>
> To: 'Tesla List' <tesla@pupman.com>
> Subject: secondary wire
> Date: Tuesday, April 07, 1998 12:26 AM
>
>
> ----------
> From: Eleanor Flood [SMTP:eflood@bellsouth.net]
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 1998 8:29 PM
> To: tesla@pupman.com
> Subject: secondary wire
>
> Maybe a stupid question, but here goes.
> We have a couple of thousand feet of #22 insulated stranded copper wire
> that we were considering using to wind a new secondary. Is this an ok
> idea, or is stranded wire detrimental to the efficiency of the coil, or
> enough so to make it undesirable to use?
> What problems might we have?
> Any info will be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Elli and Harold
>