[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Solid state Secondary
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@pupman.com>
-
Subject: Re: Solid state Secondary
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 1998 12:03:04 -0600
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
From: FutureT[SMTP:FutureT@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 1997 12:56 PM
To: tesla@pupman.com
Subject: Re: Solid state Secondary
In a message dated 97-12-31 03:28:32 EST, you write:
<<
> The first 2.5"(at the bottom of the coil)is tapered down to 11". I
> wonder how this will alter the operation of the secondary?
> Frankensteins Helper
> Max
Max,
My guess would be that minor width variations like this would not have
a noticeable effect on the coil's operation.
Coiling for today and tomorrow,
John Freau