material to coat secondary

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: material to coat secondary
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 11:23:42 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

----------
From:  Kevin Wahila [SMTP:kevinw-at-stny.lrun-dot-com]
Sent:  Saturday, April 18, 1998 7:52 PM
To:  Tesla List
Subject:  Re: material to coat secondary

how would a coating lower the resonant frequency?  anyway, i always thought
that a lower resonant frequency was better.

kevin


At 07:19 AM 4/18/98 -0500, you wrote:
>
>----------
>From:  ESchulz531 [SMTP:ESchulz531-at-aol-dot-com]
>Sent:  Friday, April 17, 1998 5:29 PM
>To:  tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
>Subject:  Re: material to coat secondary
>
>Kevin,
>	I used this Valspar Dura-Build Clear-Gloss Epoxy Finish on my secondary, I
>used two coats, it works good but it lowered my resonate frequency a lot.
>
>later,
>Erik
> 

• Prev: Magnifier 13 report
• Next: flat vs angled primary
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread