Re: Big Coils (was DOLLINGER)

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Big Coils (was DOLLINGER)
• From: "Marco Denicolai" <Marco.Denicolai-at-tellabs.fi> (by way of Terry Fritz <twf-at-verinet-dot-com>)
• Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 08:11:17 -0700
• Approved: twf-at-verinet-dot-com

tesla-at-pupman-dot-com on 15.12.98 07:01:10

To:   tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
cc:    (bcc: Marco Denicolai/MARTIS)
Subject:  Re: Big Coils (was DOLLINGER)




Original Poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" <acmq-at-compuland-dot-com.br>

>I have a program that solves the problem exactly in the general case and
>plots everything. Take a look at it at
>ftp://coe.ufrj.br/pub/acmq/teslasim.zip

In a DOS window under Windows NT returns "Runtime error 200 at 1086:0091."
I'll try also at home with WIn95.

>> According to the equation, top voltage rise at the secondary depends
mainly
>> on the square root of the secondary/primary inductance ratio
(accordingly
>> to the formula usually reported by other textbooks). That would give a
>> LOWER secondary voltage using big coils (e.g. the new one I am
designing)
>> compared with small coils (e.g. my old one).

>They have -higher- secondary/primary inductance ratio.

Sorry, you are right: I can't figure out how I calculated the ratio wrongly
!*!*;)

• Prev: Re: Re. Variac brush repair
• Next: Subject: Calculating inductance, capacitance, and resistance of 3D objects
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread