[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Effective Resistance
> From: Tesla list <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: RE: Effective Resistance
> Date: Saturday, August 26, 2000 1:24 PM
> Original poster: "John H. Couture" <couturejh-at-worldnet.att-dot-net>
> Boris -
> You may be right about Q factor and efficiency. However, I haven't
> it out yet. The Reff in the Q factor equation means losses and
> involve losses but that would not be overall losses. How would you relate
> and efficiency?
> John Couture
Since Q is just the inverse of the amount of energy lost per cycle (as a
ratio), it should be pretty easy to relate efficiency and Q. 100%
efficiency = 0 loss = infinite Q. Now, how are you going to define
efficiency? As the amount of energy left in the tuned circuit after each
cycle?: In which case Q = 1/efficiency.....
A sort problem here is that your units are not consistent. Efficiency
deals with a steady state power ratio (Pout = eff * Pin, or eff =
(Pin-Ploss)/Pin ), while Q is more of a transient effect relating to energy
stored in the tuned circuit.