[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Geek .15uF caps Was: "plate" capacitors

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Geek .15uF caps Was: "plate" capacitors
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 11:28:15 -0600
Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 12:43:07 -0600
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <mSlgRB.A.pBB.4MI46-at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "David Knaack by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <dknaack-at-rdtech-dot-com>

> Original poster: "Terry Fritz" <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>
> Personally, I would go by RMS current vs. center temperature rise.  A
> hollow capacitor, sort of like a tube, should have much higher dissipation
> since the highly thermally insulated center is removed

Is the power handling primarily thermally limited?

DK

Prev by Date: Re: SRSG phase controller (self braking)
Next by Date: Re: Geek .15uF caps Was: "plate" capacitors
Prev by thread: Re: Geek .15uF caps Was: "plate" capacitors
Next by thread: Re: Geek .15uF caps Was: "plate" capacitors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread