[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RQ gap spacing theory question
Original poster: "Teri Mckenney by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <mck-at-ezy-dot-net>
Hey Ralph, Burton
I never said the last gap was larger, I just said it was adjustable.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: RQ gap spacing theory question
> Original poster: "Barton B. Anderson by way of Terry Fritz
> Hi Ralph -
> Tesla list wrote:
> > Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
> > <Parpp807-at-aol-dot-com>
> > In a message dated 12/4/01 9:30:58 PM Central Standard Time,
> > writes:
> > > Hey Bart,All,
> > > > Does this mean the space's between the gaps don't have to be
> > > spaced?
> > > > If not , then would it be okay to permanently fix all but the end
> > of
> > >
> > > > copper, and make the last one adjustable?
> > > > Billy
> > Doesn't the larger gap run hotter? I suppose the total heat must be the
> > but setting one gap much wider than the others will corode that gap
> > than the others. No?
> > Cheers,
> > Ralph Zekelman
> That's very possible. I expect this is one of those areas where the the
> should not get carried away (depending on electrode material), but I don't
> any reason this wouldn't work for fine tuning the gap.
> Barton B. Anderson