[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Formless secondaries Was: RE: Ryan's Coil = DOA :(



Original poster: "Garry F. by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <garryfre-at-pacbell-dot-net>

Yes, to embed the coil in plastic coating I think would be very efficiant.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
To: <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: Formless secondaries Was: RE: Ryan's Coil = DOA :(


> Original poster: "Barton B. Anderson by way of Terry Fritz
<twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>" <tesla123-at-pacbell-dot-net>
>
> Hi All, Garry,
>
> I don't think internal arcs are a problem. Think of sonotube coils. That
> cardboard isn't better than a thick coat. Whichever poly/resin/etc.. is
used,
> it would certainly be better than a lossy cardboard form. As a matter of
fact,
> the sonotube might be kind of "ideal" to use considering the waxed outer
> surface. Once the form is removed, the coil should go through another
cycle of
> inner coats. One of the best methods posted on this list about a year ago
was
> to use a large pan filled with the coating. The coil is then set up to
spin
> through this coating. As it spins, it builds a very heavy and smooth
coating. I
> think a formless secondary would be "ideal".
>
> Just my 2 pennies,
> Bart
>
> Tesla list wrote: