Re: double wrapped secondary

["Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>]

Original poster: "Malcolm Watts by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <m.j.watts-at-massey.ac.nz>

On 13 Nov 2001, at 7:50, Tesla list wrote:

> Original poster: "maykrug by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>"
<mf31-at-qwest-dot-net>
> 
> all the examples i've seen, references heard, suggest that all the 
> secondaries are a single wrap
> of wire from end to end. ?, what are the expected results of having a 
> second layer wrapped back
> on top of the first,obviously one continuous length.

And connected to the first layer in which way? Consider the 
implications if they are not wired directly in parallel.

Malcolm