[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Tiresome Proofs of magnetic fields from displacement currents



Original poster: "harvey norris by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <harvich-at-yahoo-dot-com>

Dah, what seems to be the problem? It exists for
anyone making the problem observable!

Magnetic field via Axial Capacity 
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/ALT/Dsc00006.jpg

The aspect of Russian thinking is bigger is better. To
record a magnetic field from a changing electric field
in space is only a problem to make the specimen bigger
for our instruments to record. The instrument used
here is called oscilloscope on dual channel sweep.
Each channel given 1 mh  identical wind sensor for
magnetic field, each placed above magnetic and equal
size electric field oscillations.

Electric field oscillations are made by standard 5
inch diameter"wallsmart" water pitcher" surrounded by
taped aluminum foil coating poly as  insulated
electrode for axial water capacity only containing .7
nf measured with completion of 2 1/2 inch copper pipe
in water as second electrode.

 Since this is very small capacity, yet encompassing
larger area of radial field area for magnetic
sensoring, special methods need to be made to record
the changing electric field in space, and to compare
it to an equal volume of magnetic field changing in
space. Again the Russian approach is to increase both
of these volumes until the specimen can be recognized.
Thus BOTH frequency AND SIZE become effective to see
the desired effects.

Size becomes a formidable problem, but is accomplished
through the use of 20,000 winds of 23 gauge wire on a
5 inch diameter air core coil yeilding some ~ 60
HENRY.

Frequency is accomplished via use of alternator inputs
of 480 hz. A faster moving electric field through
space guarantees the  better sensoring of its magnetic
field counterpart.

Resonance of components as the final measure gives a
discovery of how phasings occur. By making each
inductive and capacitive reactance near to equal value
of apparent conduction, this precondition for series
resonance itself guarantees the understanding that the
oscillation of energy between the magnetic and
electric fields will be 90 degress out of phase.
Thefore a sensor above the electric field, will be
actually inductively recording a later secondarily
derived magnetic field from that changing electric
field, which is also additionally delayed 90 degrees
from the original impulse. Therfore equal wound
inductive sensors above both the electric and magnetic
fields in source frequency resonance should actually
be about 180 out of phase.

Magnetic field via Axial Capacity (2) 
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/ALT/1211.jpg

In these recorded instances the coils have a conical
top area winding so that the axial water capacity is
actually  below the inductive scope sensor. The
electric field derived voltages are 10 scale smaller
that the magnetic, and given 10 times higher voltage
selection on dual scope to better show phasings
between the two fields themselves.

THE SECOND MODIFICATION ACTS TO Proove THE PREMISE.
If the causes of electromotive force are secondarily
derived by secondarily derived magnetic fields, we
should suspect that they will also secondarily " after
the fact" induce amperage on line connections. This
can if fact be done by allowing that axial electric
field in "close resonant values" to be shared by
another phases (120 degreed source) resonant magnetic
field using a conventional flat plexiglass capacity
for its resonance. The magnetic field from one
resonance than exists at right angles with the
electric field from another phased resonance.(BECAUSE
OF PROVISION OF EACH COMPONENT EXISTING IN SAME SPACE
ORTHOGONALLY) To ascertain the true phasing
relationship between the phases delivered by
alternator we might try knowing the stator line
amperage vs the actual phase amperage at shared node,
and if this is double as shown we surmise the angles
are 180 vs 120.

http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/files/Flux%20Capacitor/1013b.jpg
Shows the effect and the water capacity. 11 and 13 ma
phasings combine in the return line to show 25 ma,
even with the addiional diversion of  current made by
20 inch neon to exterior capacity.

By considering the conventional coordinants of
reactance X(C) and X(L), we find that placing X(L)
orthoganally in the space of X(C), or vice versa
actually experimentally exhibits a new type of
reactance where it can be conveniently represented as
a Z (3 dimensional reactance coordinant): and this is
also knwon by the fact that a magnetic field, whether
primarily or secondarily created will influence the
final impedance where these processes interact in the
same space. Thus if one phase contains a limiting -Z
reactance in its amperage line of delivery, and the
phase it spatially reacts with contains a + z
impedance coordinate limiting that line amperage: in
this way it is in fact possible to explain the fact
that when the lines are joined for the return current
to both phases they contain in excess of the addition
of both currents, by virtue of the fact that similar
to ordinary tank resonance, the amperage inside the
circuit is higher than that inputed, But here the
opposite factor is exhibited where currents containing
inherent 3 dimensional reactance additions are
released from that reactance limitation upon their
combination. In this way 11 and 13 ma combine on the
return line to show 25 ma, which if we dont invent a 3
dimensional reactance coordiante to explain the
effect, we are sorely advised to rewrite Kirchoff's
nodal amperage laws!

Sincerely HDN




=====
Tesla Research Group; Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://groups.yahoo-dot-com/group/teslafy/

_