[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sorry Big file size for Master Blaster Pic--What size
Original poster: "Gregory Hunter by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <ghunter31014-at-yahoo-dot-com>
Bill & All,
Usually, the lowest resolution the digital camera
offers is good enough for web content, plus the
resulting file sizes are more friendly for our
bandwidth-challenged "dialup" cousins. If your digicam
has 640 x 480 on the menu, go for that. My Kodak
DX3900 won't go that low, so I use the photo editing
software that came with my flatbed scanner to resize
the JPGs to only 33% of their original size. These
shrunken images look just fine on web pages and they
won't bog down your modem.
--- Tesla list <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com> wrote:
> Original poster: "by way of Terry Fritz
> <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>" <Teslamagnifier-at-aol-dot-com>
> Greetings fellow Coilers
> I'd like to get a web site up about my coiling
> experiences. Just got a digital
> camera--like a hole in the head--.
> What size picture (ie1200x1600) should one use for
> web pictures?? I emailed a
> picture of my Master Blaster, and it seemed to take
> a long time to upload.
> Sorry if I made anyone wait too long for this stupid
> picture. I wonder if this
> camera will take time exposures for sparks (using a
> tripod) The print in the
> manual is microscopic.
> Bill Shepard
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®