[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GMHEICSLR - altitude correction??

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: GMHEICSLR - altitude correction??
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:34:48 -0600
Cc: "Sam Barros" <mail-at-powerlabs-dot-org>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.0.20021010161751.01ff24b0-at-mail.timeship-dot-net>
References: <4.1.20021010122934.00a8e640-at-pop.dnvr.qwest-dot-net><8824A7AF2E4BB74BBFE01E2B13EDAAE701D46DA2-at-tayexc13.americas .cpqcorp-dot-net>
Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:34:55 -0600
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <MhOry.A.hS.c6gp9-at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "Terry Fritz" <twftesla-at-qwest-dot-net>

Hi All,

I went back through all my old mail and we have four contenders!  I wrote
them all to clarify and confirm the data they gave.  If there are any
others out there that never wrote me, you had better write me NOW (
terrellf-at-qwest-dot-net )!!
I need to know the following:

Spark length and number of sparks achieved at that length?

Altitude the attempt was made at?

As far as I can tell, spark length vs. altitude is a linear function for
the ranges we are concerned with.  I'll assume that.

So we'll see what comes back.  In the mean time, I think I had better start
packing the Fabulous GMHEICSLR up!!!

http://hot-streamer-dot-com/temp/GMHEICSLR.jpg

http://www.powerlabs-dot-org/gmheicslr.htm

Cheers,

	Terry

References:
- GMHEICSLR - altitude correction??
  - From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>

Prev by Date: Re: "real" lightning and TC lightning...
Next by Date: Re: "real" lightning and TC lightning...
Prev by thread: GMHEICSLR - altitude correction??
Next by thread: GMHEICSLR - Update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread