[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The 1500t secondary myth
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: The 1500t secondary myth
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:16:40 -0700
- Delivered-to: teslarchive@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 18:17:56 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <wL8VsD.A.NrC.w0mrBB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Dr. Resonance" <resonance@xxxxxxxxxx>
I don't know for sure, but it works.
Dr. Resonance
>
>
>
> >It's not a myth --- it's physics, pure and simple.
> >
> >The potential developed across an inductor is V = -L di/dt.
>
> Accepting the 4.5:1 ratio as a good precaution against strikes to primary
> circuit, and striving towards as small a resistance as possible in the
> secondary coil.
>
> How does it make sence to use more turns than those that allow the build
up
> of a voltage higher than that limited by the transfer of energy from the
> primary capacitor to the secondary capacitance?
>
> Cheers, Finn Hammer
>
>
>
>
>