[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Secondary size
Original poster: Thomas <tom-at-pwrcom-dot-com.au>
> Original poster: "Luke" <Bluu-at-cox-dot-net>
> Thanx for the idea behind your method, glad you sited your REASONS.
The reason for selecting a minimum secondary height was stated a number of
Here it is again:
Select a minimum height based on expected power input, to prevent numerous
strikes to the primary/strike rail.
Why not make it larger than this, or what are the *maximum* size selection
2) practicality, i.e. say you need at least a 1.5m terminal height for a 1kW
TC, why bother trying to make and store a 100m high x 20m diameter coil in
your garage when it only makes 1.4m sparks?