[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: SSTC theory

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: RE: SSTC theory
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:59:40 -0600
Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:04:11 -0600
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <c2BXsD.A.a6D.f1u2AB-at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: "Steve Conner" <steve.conner-at-optosci-dot-com> 

 >So, in this network the primary and secondary circuits are -not-
 >tuned to the same frequency!
 >The driving frequency is the resonant frequency of the secondary
 >circuit alone. The primary circuit is tuned to a slightly lower
 >frequency. Strange, but true.

Interesting. This matches with experimental results. The ISSTC people found
that the primary has to be tuned ~15% lower. I thought it was streamer
loading but..

Steve C.

Prev by Date: RE: SSTC does 10 foot sparks
Next by Date: Re: power v energy measurements, was Re: SSTC does 10 foot sparks
Prev by thread: Re: SSTC theory
Next by thread: Re: SSTC theory
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread