[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lighting things (II) Re: No Free Energy was Re: SSTC design procedure

To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: lighting things (II) Re: No Free Energy was Re: SSTC design procedure
From: "Tesla list" <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 19:16:14 -0600
Resent-Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 19:20:17 -0600
Resent-From: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Resent-Message-ID: <0TDKWC.A.IkF.GrqrAB-at-poodle>
Resent-Sender: tesla-request-at-pupman-dot-com

Original poster: Jerry Chamkis <jchamkis-at-bga-dot-com> 


 >     It IS possible to light flurescents 'wirelessly'.  Thsi is HIDEOUSLY
 >     inefficient!
 >
 >      best
 >        dwp

Very true.  Note that flourescent lamps in the near field only glow, they put
out only a small fraction of the light that would be produced by the intended
(line powered) excitation.
-- 
Jerry Chamkis
jchamkis-at-bga-dot-com

Prev by Date: Re: About the skin effect in humans
Next by Date: Re: Coil Form needed 2
Prev by thread: Re: toroid
Next by thread: RE: lighting things (II) Re: No Free Energy was Re: SSTC design procedure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread