[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DRSSTC driver tests- Dual resonance disaster
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: DRSSTC driver tests- Dual resonance disaster
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:18:50 -0700
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Old-return-path: <email@example.com>
- Resent-date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:20:01 -0700 (MST)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <FH134B.A.ZBG.ecX-BB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: "Bob (R.A.) Jones" <a1accounting@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Where do you get your feedback signal from? primary current, secondary base
current, C to top load
: RE: DRSSTC driver tests- Dual resonance disaster
> Original poster: "Steve Conner" <steve.conner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> just confusing things.
> I think the problem was that the secondary was tuned pretty low. This
> increases the primary current at the upper pole and decreases it at the
> lower one. So the lower pole wasn't giving a strong enough feedback signal
> to get the PLL to lock. When I tuned them both exactly together so the two
> poles were the same size, I could get it locked onto either one.
reverses or something.
> Steve C.