Re: Secondary Resonance LC and Harmonics

["Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Original poster: Mddeming@xxxxxxx 


Jared & Co.

    In science, perhaps unfortunately, it is the new theory on the block 
that must prove itself. This means:

1) Adequate specific procedures and hard data must be provided to allow 
third parties to attempt duplication of any results that purport to support 
the theory.

2) The new theory must reduce to the traditional one in all cases where the 
traditional explanation is known to hold.

3) The new theory must also, in at least one repeatable case, make an 
accurate prediction where the traditional theory does not.

 Again, the more revolutionary the theory, the more extensive and 
compelling the evidence must be. I do not think that the majority of 
professional scientists on the list feel that your postings have risen to 
this level yet.

Matt D.





.In a message dated 6/28/05 2:17:27 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
tesla@xxxxxxxxxx writes:

You cited mathematical errors, but were not specific. You claim that
we prey on  newbies and in the same breath you advocate velocity
factors that we have already demonstrated are untrue (proof by
contradiction) with our Capacitance to Free Space experiment.

I think that you have been lulled into believing that simple equations
could not possibly describe something as complicated as a resonant
coil. Yet simple equations; energy equations in particular, are the
cornerstones of physics.

  Jared Dwarshuis