[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ScanTesla program -> Optimization
- To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: ScanTesla program -> Optimization
- From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 00:37:58 -0600
- Delivered-to: testla@pupman.com
- Delivered-to: tesla@pupman.com
- In-reply-to: <BAY3-DAV15A770D97BED61031DBF51D1080@phx.gbl>
- Old-return-path: <teslalist@twfpowerelectronics.com>
- References: <6.0.3.0.2.20050518230122.02494aa8@twfpowerelectronics.com> <BAY3-DAV15A770D97BED61031DBF51D1080@phx.gbl>
- Resent-date: Thu, 19 May 2005 00:38:30 -0600 (MDT)
- Resent-from: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
- Resent-message-id: <IueVYB.A.zH.lRDjCB@poodle>
- Resent-sender: tesla-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Original poster: Terry Fritz <teslalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi,
There is no R1 (R one). It is sposed to be Rl (R L) for R load... I
wondered if I should use Rload, Rprimary, Rsecondary.... But it just got
to be too messy...
One it is "all done", you can always find and replace...
Cheers,
Terry
At 12:10 AM 5/19/2005, you wrote:
Hi Malcolm,
By R1 are you meaning RL, the streamer load. Some fonts you cant tell the
difference between a "one" and a "little L" :-(( Seems like both CL and
RL would be time varying and the C program might be able to model those
dependencies if one made some assumptions about streamer growth (I just
dont know what those assumptions might be).
Gerry R.