[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ScanTesla7.62 :-))
Original poster: "Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz" <acmdq@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tesla list wrote:
Original poster: Vardan <vardan01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I have never been more pleased with ScanTesla than I am now :-)))))))
It seems to "finally" be doing its master's bidding >:-))) The
obnoxious greased pig seems to be finally "tame"!!!
I modeled all types of coils and included examples of all in the ZIP
now. They all agree fine!!
I can no longer find bugs in it. It can now scan for the "longest
streamer". But you might still want to use maximum load power
search for the "brightest" streamer! It can also do quenching now
(and scan for the best quench time) and of course streamer
hits. The ground arcs match scope pictures now in the 1'sof uS time
range too :-)) I was even doing some first few nS things and it
"liked that" ;-)) The dynamic streamer model is totally reworked
and really "does" work now.
I wonder if I should just get rid of fixed streamer load inputs now...
There is a constant for streamer length that seems to work well but
could easily be tweaked if it is too much or too little. Streamer
hits also have a "connect time" constant... But they are as good as
we know today... I did not want to have them as "inputs" since that
seems to always bust things...
So I think this is a "real good" version.... Give it a few days to
be sure :O))) But I can see no reason to change anything now after
playing with it all day. After playing with it all day today, I am
still using "last night's" version :-))):
Can you comment about how is the dynamic streamer model? I think that
I didn't see it described here. By the way, it appears that I am not
receiving some (maybe most of) the messages.
Looking at the source code, it seems that C3 is being changed during
the calculations. This can be done, but the state variable must be
changed to q3 (charge) instead of v3, because if c3 changes, v3
Antonio Carlos M. de Queiroz