[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 40N60 IGBTs no longer available? (fwd)



Original poster: "Joshua Gutfriend" <josh123spartan@xxxxxxxxxxx>

I checked and the 30N60 that I plan on using is the SOT-227. I plan on buying them from Newark InOne (Canada) and just thought that it could be a substitute for the 40N60 considering there allmost identicle.

Thanks'
Josh


From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 40N60 IGBTs no longer available? (fwd)
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:47:50 -0700 (MST)

Original poster: List moderator <mod1@xxxxxxxxxx>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 23:27:33 -0600
From: Steve Ward <steve.ward@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 40N60 IGBTs no longer available? (fwd)

Josh,

Be careful about the package type.  I started the 40N60 craze (as far
as i can tell), and i used the SOT-227 (mini block) package.  The
40N60 still exists in TO-247 package.  I can not vouch for their
robustness in DRSSTC use, as i havent tried them.  With some care, im
sure they will work, but you probably cant punish them as much as the
mini-block type.

Be sure to get the ones with an internal diode, it saves a lot of
design work on the bridge.

Steve

On 10/28/06, Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Original poster: List moderator <mod1@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:45:28 -0500
> From: Joshua Gutfriend <josh123spartan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: 40N60 IGBTs no longer available?
>
> As I was reading up on DRSSTCs on Hv Wiki the information that I got said
> that the 40N60 IGBTs that I've see so many people use is no longer
> available. Is this true? If so I have come across the 30N60 IGBTs that are
> in the same line as the 40N60s. The only diference is that they are rated 4
> amps less. Will theses be okay to use?
>
> Josh
>
>