[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: V11.1 for JAVATC (fwd)



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:39:08 -0700
From: Anthony R. Mollner <penny831@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: V11.1 for JAVATC (fwd)

Hi David,
  Well, that seems to be what I've discovered as well. Now it's time to put
a s@#t load of CDE caps together. What's the consensus on the voltage level
for each string? I have heard of some guys running those 942C caps right at
the transformer AC output, in my case 15kv but, that really doesn't sound
wise to me. On the other hand, running strings of 21+ will cost an arm and a
leg and various other body parts that I'd like to hang on to! So, what does
everyone think would be nice and safe?

Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: Tesla list [mailto:tesla@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 5:47 AM
To: tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: V11.1 for JAVATC (fwd)



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:44:50 +0000
From: David Rieben <drieben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tesla list <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: drieben@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: V11.1 for JAVATC (fwd)

Hi Tony,

Well, let's see. 60 Hz mains resonance with a 15/120 transformer(s) is
about .02 uFd and the general consensus on capacitor size with SRSGs
in NST systems is about 2.8X resonant capacitance value, that would
come out to .056 uFd. So .055 uFd sounds just about "right on the mo-
ney" to me :^)


David Rieben

-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Tesla list" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>

>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 07:23:48 -0700
> From: Anthony R. Mollner
> To: Tesla list
> Subject: RE: V11.1 for JAVATC (fwd)
>
> I like this program, it's a real time saver. I was surprised at the
> capacitor value it figured for my set up. I'm running a 15/120 input with
a
> SRSG and the value that JAVATC gave me of .055 for LTR. This was a lot
> higher than I would have imagined, does that sound right?
>
> Tony
>
>
>
>