RE: New list? Was Re: [TCML] Threadkill -- RQ Non-coiling stuff

[johnbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Verry Good Reply Sir!!
True TCML.
j.


On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:32:19 -0700 (MST), "Chip Atkinson"
<chip@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> Yep, Gary's right.  I think I'm going to let someone else set up and run
> another list/forum for non-coiling type talk.  I just don't have the time
> and want to preserve the bandwidth that I have.  
> 
> It would be nice to know what ends up happening so we the moderators can
> just say "this discussion should be moved to <whatever that list will
> be>.
> 
> Chip
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Lau, Gary wrote:
> 
> > I couldn't agree more!  But as Chip is unlikely to be involved in a
> > Tesla_gossip_and_hero_worship forum, it doesn't seem that he would be
> > the one to suggest a specific venue.
> > 
> > As far as fracturing the membership, I think splitting between the
> > science-based on the current TCML and all else that would be rejected
> > here on the new forum makes sense and is what everyone wants.
> > 
> > As to which venue - if you build it, they will come.  Let us know what
> > you choose.  And if the mechanics of that forum prove unsatisfactory,
> > a short discussion by participants on that forum should be able to
> > choose a different forum.
> > 
> > Regards, Gary Lau
> > MA, USA
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> > > Behalf Of William Beaty
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 2:24 PM
> > > To: Tesla Coil Mailing List
> > > Subject: Re: New list? Was Re: [TCML] Threadkill -- RQ Non-coiling stuff
> > >
> > > On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Chip Atkinson wrote:
> > >
> > > > boils down to judgement calls in many circumstances.
> > >
> > > Certainly.
> > >
> > > However, if we could agree to choose a single existing forum, where TCML
> > > threads could be moved, then your decisions would never need to be harsh.
> > > Supposing that "USA-TESLA" or one of those yahoo groups was the list
> > > always used for this, then you'd never have to do things like block TCML
> > > users from talking with RQ about his recent life events.
> > >
> > > Obviously we can all contact him for private news.  But then he has to
> > > respond to five or ten (or fifty?) people separately.  And those who'd
> > > rather just listen in cannot do so.  TCML community isn't in on the talk,
> > > and the whole point of having a forum and an online group is lost in
> > > that particular case.
> > >
> > > In other words...  Jeeze, this is the internet, and if half of a group
> > > really wants to talk with someone, while the other half doesn't, we don't
> > > have to side with just one half, instead it's trivial to do both.
> > >
> > > And about all those weirdo topics that Chip *wants* to kill, he of course
> > > would still have that option:  either telling everyone "take this to the
> > > group TCML-bar-and-grill@yahoo," or telling everyone that the thread is
> > > dead.
> > >
> > > Thinking further...  BBS forums rarely have a single section, instead
> > > they'll have a central area, plus a "how do I unsubscribe" technical
> > > channel, plus an unmoderated "joe's tavern" where the whole community can
> > > hobnob about anything.  Take for example THE STRAIGHT DOPE science board.
> > > Of course it wouldn't make sense for this email-only forum to have *NINE*
> > > sections like straighdope/sdmb/.  But what about a single, perhaps even
> > > unofficial/unmoderated, "joe's tavern" feature?
> > >
> > > Then there's the slippery slope! :)  Add a TCML-announce list for people
> > > who want to hear about Teslathons, but who can't stand the high traffic of
> > > the main list.  But you know where that will lead.  Soon the subscribers
> > > on TCML-oiltank-secondaries will get into a huge fight with the people on
> > > TCML-rebuild-wardenclyffe, while TCML-IGBT-watercooled laughs and laughs.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > (((((((((((((((((( ( (  (   (    (O)    )   )  ) ) )))))))))))))))))))
> > > William J. Beaty                http://staff.washington.edu/wbeaty/
> > > beaty chem washington edu       Research Engineer
> > > billbamascicom                  UW Chem Dept,  Bagley Hall RM74
> > > 206-543-6195                    Box 351700, Seattle, WA 98195-1700
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Tesla mailing list
> > > Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tesla mailing list
> > Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
-- 
  
  johnbrooks@xxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users:
  http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla