RE: [TCML] BPS Testing

["Lau, Gary" <Gary.Lau@xxxxxx>]

Hi Bart,

I'm confused - When you say the firing rate increased by 11%, isn't that the same as saying that the BPS increased by 11%?  I think most would interpret it as such.

Regards, Gary Lau
MA, USA

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tesla-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of bartb
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 5:10 PM
> To: Tesla Coil Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [TCML] BPS Testing
>
> Hi John,
>
> A clarification. When I wrote the firing rate increased by 11%, I'm
> specifically talking about the number of faster breaks (not the actual
> bps). Thus, the higher occurrences of breaks did not scale 1:1 with the
> 120V test, but increased these occurrences by about 11% overall.
>
> Bart
>
> bartb wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Ok, I guess it has always been 1.7 but for some reason I was thinking
> > the 1.7 was an update from some value before that (long ago). I guess
> > not.
> >
> > FutureT@xxxxxxx wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, but that's a good feature to have in JavaTC.  And your  new
> >> BPS of 104 or whatever seems pretty good now.  Wasn't it 88  before?
> >> Not a 50% increase, but a nice increase I think.  Does  the
> >> coil seem to run smoother at the 104 BPS?
> >>
> >> John

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla