[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCML] Single MOT Coil?



MOT is good for DC-coil but DC-coil can't operate with static spark gap :(
You must go to NST or MOT with some current limiting option or make rotary spark gap. I was try to make static spark gap for DC-coil (with MOT of course) without any success.


Dnia 16.08.2013 o 19:55 Atomic <atomicrox@xxxxxxxxx> Atomic <atomicrox@xxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):

Jason, do you think it'd be possible to limit current to a low enough level
and use a static spark gap?
(as a poor man's NST substitute on a small coil)


On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Jason Johnson <jasonmsusolar@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

I too have had good luck with a single MOT. Utilizing a level shifter
circuit (as the thing was designed for after all) is a great way to both
increase voltage and limit current. To lower current, you just lower the
capacitance in the level shifter. I have used three microwave caps in
series on a small coil to provide low, medium and high with no variac or
heavy ballast (capacitors are way lighter than iron cores and copper
windings). That particular coil uses a hyperbaric style single static gap that is made from 3/4" copper pipe fittings, a length of 4" PVC pipe and a vacuum cleaner blower (the blower motor is on a dimmer set to about 50%). I have also built rotary gaps that work well at these voltages (~5 kV firing
voltage). Total gap spacing is around 1/16".

In the microwave, there is very little current limiting from the magnetron.
Most of the impedance that is seen by the plug-in side of the world is
because of the level shifter capacitor on the high voltage side. The
magnetron is approximately 50% efficient - meaning that a 750 watt oven
(typical) will have a 1500 watt transformer/level shifter. To get 1500
watts at 2000 volts (again typical values) you need about 2667 ohms of
impedance. At 60 Hz, a 1 uF capacitor is 2653 ohms. With transformer
saturation and component value tolerances thrown in, I think it is a wash
and is safe to say that microwave oven transformers are designed to be
capacitively ballasted on the high side!

To get half the wattage, you can use two caps in series for half the total
capacitance. You could also use those two caps in parallel to double the
wattage. Simple jumper arrangements on the cap terminals allow you to
change the power settings easily, just be sure to do it when the coil is
off and the caps have had a minute to discharge. All modern microwave
capacitors seem to have an internal bleeder, but I like to add an extra one
anyways.

Biggest piece of advice by far that I have learned about level shifters
driving Tesla coils is this - *use lots and lots of voltage headroom on
your level shifter diode*! Filtering helps too, but for example I use 30
1N4007 diodes in series for my single stage level shifter (i.e. 30 kV at 1
amp rating for a 5600 volt nominal level shifter peak voltage). That
finally seemed to be enough to handle the RF nastiness - faster diodes may
require less safety factor but I haven't tried.

Also, it seems to me that the tiniest MOTs are still capable of delivering
LOTS of current, so use the smallest one in your collection. With one or
two microwave caps strapped to the top or side of the little beasty you are very hard pressed to find a more compact, lighter 1kW supply (at least one
based on an iron core). The duty cycle is limited, of course - but you
would also be hard pressed to run your coil for long enough to bother the
MOT and even then you can add oil cooling with not much extra mass or
volume.

Good luck!

- Jason


On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Dan Kline <misterpaslow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks, Ted.
> Very interesting information! I have considered building a DC coil in the
> past so that I could tune in a perfect break rate and get max sparkage
that
> way.
> I may go this route since I can build upward but not outward :)  But
about
> the space issues, I think I may just move to larger apartment sometime in
> the near future.
> Dan
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: Tesla <tesla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: Tesla Coil Mailing List <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 3:46 PM
> >Subject: Re: [TCML] Single MOT Coil?
> >
> >
> >Team
> >
> >I'd qualify some of the points Mark makes.
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla