[Home][2016 Index] Re: [TCML] Spark Gap Electrodes - Flat or Rounded [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TCML] Spark Gap Electrodes - Flat or Rounded



Ok thanks, maybe ill just use screw on brass electrodes for now i dont have anything to round out tungsten.

Sent from my HTC

----- Reply message -----
From: "Carl Noggle" <cn8@xxxxxxx>
To: "Tesla Coil Mailing List" <tesla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [TCML] Spark Gap Electrodes - Flat or Rounded
Date: Mon, Jan 18, 2016 6:12 PM

All spark gaps should be rounded.  The field enhancement at the edges of 
a flat gap electrode will cause it to go into corona before the spark 
forms, giving erratic operation.  A radius of curvature less than about 
25% of the gap spacing will go into corona first. Also, with wear the 
electrodes will eventually become rounded, requiring adjustment during 
the process.  (Nature usually knows best.)

---Carl




On 1/18/2016 4:21 PM, Matthew Sweeney wrote:
> I see a great deal of conflicting information regarding this, and I'm in
> the process of making my tungsten spark gap for a small single NST
> (12k/30ma) coil.
>
> Should I be using tungsten rods with flat ends, or rounded? I've heard that
> rounded ends are good for safety gaps but actual spark gaps should have
> nice flattened ends. Is this true for static gaps and not just rotary gaps?
>
> I will eventually make an RQ gap but starting off simple for now with a
> basic one or two static rod gap design.
>
> Any help appreciated!
>
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
>

_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
_______________________________________________
Tesla mailing list
Tesla@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla