[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Spark Gap (fwd)
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@pupman.com>
-
Subject: Spark Gap (fwd)
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 22:01:40 -0500
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
----------
From: Jim Lux [SMTP:jimlux@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, May 25, 1998 10:42 AM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: Spark Gap (fwd)
>
> I can't see a single reason why it should be lower. Besides, Rgap is
> a dynamic impedance which varies with Ip. Multiple gaps most
> certainly have a higher voltage drop when conducting as each has a
> minimum saturation voltage, again dependent on Ip.
>
> Malcolm
>
That voltage is pretty darn low, though. Consider an arc welder, where the
voltage drop across the gap is a few 10's of volts. Even with 10 gaps in
series, a hundred volts of drop is pretty small compared to the several kV
on the cap.