[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: 130kW Coil Update (fwd)
-
To: tesla@pupman.com
-
Subject: Re: 130kW Coil Update (fwd)
-
From: Tesla List <mod1@pupman.com>
-
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 21:29:18 -0600 (MDT)
-
Approved: mod1@poodle.pupman.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 09:54:57 +1000
From: Phil Chalk <philoc@ozemail.com.au>
To: Tesla List <tesla@pupman.com>
Subject: Re: 130kW Coil Update
Tesla List wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sun, 05 Oct 1997 13:18:53 +0000
> From: Greg Leyh <lod@pacbell.net>
> To: Tesla List <tesla@pupman.com>
> Subject: Re: 130kW Coil Update
>
> For instance, the secondary coil cannot be visible;
> it must be
> on the _inside_ of the coilform. And the primary
> cannot be seen
> either, so it must be inside of the secondary! The
> coil is
> literally arranged 'inside-out'. Should this
> matter? We'll see.
>
> -GL
Greg,
I'm keen to see how it works. I had considered
building a coil 'inside-out', for purely aesthetic
reasons. But on the scale of the coils I'm building,
this seems a little more difficult. Getting a decent
primary _inside_ a 3 or 4" coil wasn't going to be
easy....
I'd also had the encapsulated 'coil without a former'
idea too - and will do it one day on a smaller scale.
Good Luck with your results. I expect I'll see the
sparks from here......
Cheers,
Phil Chalk.