[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Neon Tranformer bypass caps.
-
To: tesla@grendel.objinc.com, KLINEDA@univscvm.csd.scarolina.edu, QUANTUM@univscvm.csd.scarolina.edu, WMEYER@scientia.up.ac.za, bhaley@shore.net, frerichs@zfe.siemens.de, froula@cig.mot.com, haba@snakemail.hut.fi, jetter@ix.netcom.com, scott@csustan.csustan.edu
-
Subject: Re: Neon Tranformer bypass caps.
-
From: Esondrmn@aol.com
-
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 13:29:27 -0500
-
>Received: from mail02.mail.aol.com (mail02.mail.aol.com [152.163.172.66]) by uucp-1.csn.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA23806 for <tesla@grendel.objinc.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 1995 11:36:08 -0700
In a message dated 95-11-14 00:05:42 EST, tesla@grendel.objinc.com writes:
>Subject: Neon Tranformer bypass caps.
>
>
>I have four, no-PCB, oil filled transmitter bypass caps rated at 25KV each
at
>.012 uF. I would like to use these a bypass caps on my Tesla filter board.
>
>With my neon transformer supply, I planned on using two caps in series on
>each
>side of the neon to ground. This should give a DC voltage rating of 50 KV
>at .006 uF. From what I have read, the capacitance is a bit high for a
neon.
>Will there be any problem with destructive oscillations in the neon
secondary
>with this arrangement.
>
>The France neon sign transformer applications manual warns against long HV
>cable
>runs, due to the effectives of the capacitance on "the tranformer insulation
>system". I wonder if there will be a similar problem here.
>
>Thanks for any help!
>
>Don Froula
Don,
.006 mfd will be too high for RF bypass capacitors. The idea is for the
bypass caps to offer a low impedance path to the RF. You want something in
the range of 300 to 1000 pf.
Ed Sonderman