[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: First post: Fluorescent lighting
----------
From: Tesla List[SMTP:tesla@poodle.pupman.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 1996 11:25 PM
To: Tesla-list-subscribers@poodle.pupman.com
Subject: Re: First post: Fluorescent lighting
> Subject: First post: Fluorescent lighting
>From bturner@apc.netTue Oct 15 22:08:05 1996
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 00:46:02 -0700
From: open_minded <bturner@apc.net>
To: tesla@pupman.com
Subject: Re: First post: Fluorescent lighting
Tesla List wrote:
>
> >From pgantt@ix.netcom.comMon Oct 14 21:22:41 1996
> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 17:04:42 -0700
> From: pgantt@ix.netcom.com
> To: tesla@poodle.pupman.com
> Subject: First post: Fluorescent lighting
<<major snip>>
> power consumption by about 42.5%.
>
> So, that is what I have in a nutshell. Any comments?
>
> Phil Gantt
Phil -
One thing does come to mind, and that is for every lamp per your
design will have a small RF generator on it. If you have a whole
bunch of these things in a building, and if they are all not EXACTLY
on the same frequency, you could wind up with an electrical
cacouphany(sp?), ie: RF chaos.
I would imagine that the FCC would step in and require that every
lighting fixture (or the building) be RF shielded...
Just my off-the-wall thoughts.
- Brent
Brent,
Do you mean the type of RF shielding that is used in todays
personal computers?
I live in a high RF environment.
D. Gowin
[Part 2, Application/MS-TNEF 2.9KB]
[Unable to print this part]