[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@pupman.com>
-
Subject: magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 08:52:46 -0600
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
----------
From: FutureT [SMTP:FutureT@aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 1998 6:41 AM
To: tesla@pupman.com
Subject: Re: magnifier vs. classic tc (magnifier modeling)
In a message dated 98-03-22 01:40:55 EST, you write:
<<
> I am personally happy with the results I've obtained. As I say, k for
> my driver was somewhere between 0.4 and 0.5 and I obtained overall
> k with unequivocal resolution from the scope of less that 0.1. In fact
> I have the first piccies of the traces back now. I will scope the
> same driver with different primaries and different resonators at some
> stage.
Malcolm >>
Malcolm,
Did you mention the inductance values you used in your tests, I don't
seem to remember seeing them? The inductance ratio made a big
difference in my tests, but now I'm seeing still new factors which I've
described in another posting.
John Freau