[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Tube magnifiers, was: In vs. Out [small magnefier ]
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@poodle.pupman.com>
-
Subject: Re: Tube magnifiers, was: In vs. Out [small magnefier ]
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 03:40:25 -0500
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
From: FutureT@aol.com[SMTP:FutureT@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 1997 12:18 PM
To: tesla@pupman.com
Subject: Re: Tube magnifiers, was: In vs. Out [small magnefier ]
In a message dated 97-07-22 12:30:45 EDT, you write:
<< To: John Freau
> Thanks for the data. With the present workload we probably won't get at
> this project until sometime in August or Sept. Any data you might have
> would be helpful.
> DR.RESONANCE@next-wave.net
>>
DR. R,
I sent some data on a larger system in another post, but I like Richard
Hull's suggestion of using a radar pulser circuit to drive the system.
Regular tube magnifiers seem incapable of outperforming a regular tube
coil, so any project of this type would seem useful only from a novelty
point of view. It is of course possible that my designs were sub-optimal
and that better performance can be coaxed from such a TC.
In any case, good luck with the project.
John Freau