[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Thyratron pair (was DC Drive)
-
To: tesla@pupman.com
-
Subject: Re: Thyratron pair (was DC Drive)
-
From: Tesla List <mod1@pupman.com>
-
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 14:46:02 -0600 (MDT)
-
Approved: mod1@poodle.pupman.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 08:15:54 +1200
From: Malcolm Watts <MALCOLM@directorate.wnp.ac.nz>
To: tesla@pupman.com
Subject: Re: Thyratron pair (was DC Drive)
Hi Randy,
> From: randy@gte.net
> To: Tesla List <tesla@pupman.com>
> Subject: Re: Thyratron pair (was DC Drive)
>
> Tesla List wrote:
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> <SNIP>
> > I should point out that this is essentially CW drive and that this
> > has all been done before. Duane Bylund published a CW fed mag
> > some time ago using a 1/2 bridge driver. The real trick would be to
> > get power disruptively into a single resonator. I don't think it can
> > be done without using at least one other coil but I could be wrong.
> > I would regard a tap on the resonator as equivalent to using a second
> > coil.
> >
> > MalcolmI am more confused than ever; if it is "pulsed", how can it be CW?
> Is it the ringing waveform?
Check the circuit. You are alternately connecting an LC circuit
between each rail and a centre-tap. If you do this at a frequency
lower than the LC resonant frequency, you will not get the highest
power throughput. The cap charge time is constrained by the surge
impedance. Perhaps I'm missing something but I didn't see any
separate charge circuit for the cap.
Malcolm
> I made a post earlier that hasn't shown up here as of yet, where
> I asked about feeding assorted resultant voltages to an "autotransformer"
> which is what I presume you mean by "a tap on the resonator"...yes?
Yes.
> Randy
>
>