[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Tesla and Measurements.
-
To: 76333.3601@compuserve.com, DAVIDJ@diamondmm.com, DELCOKEVIN@aol.com, DavidT65@aol.com, GYZT07A@prodigy.com, P.L.Mason@bath.ac.uk, adamant@bis.net.au, ahantsch@com.uncor.edu, cdhu2@phys.ntu.edu.tw, dberkey@ionet.net, dlima@analogic.com, dll@egg-rb.com, goodman@math.utah.edu, imcgillivray@cix.compulink.co.uk, jbwebst@ari.net, msr7@po.cwru.edu, mycrump@cris.com, rjgray@rmii.com, rmonica@attmail.com, robert.michaels@online.sme.org, tchand@slip.net, tesla@grendel.objinc.com, tesla@southwind.net, tweagan@maind.dnet.dupont.com
-
Subject: Re: Tesla and Measurements.
-
From: ed@alumni.caltech.edu
-
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 11:12:12 -0800
-
>Received: from alumni.caltech.edu (alumni.caltech.edu [131.215.50.234]) by uucp-1.csn.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA23543 for <tesla@grendel.objinc.com>; Sat, 30 Mar 1996 12:23:08 -0700
Malcom:
Saved your message and will ponder and offer a reply
(for what it's worth) when I get a bit of time. What counts
in the coupling is k times Q. Problem is in defining the Q
to use when both primary and secondary are dominated by
nonlinear sparks.
More later,
Ed