[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Magnetic quenched gaps [electromagnets]
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@poodle.pupman.com>
-
Subject: Re: Magnetic quenched gaps [electromagnets]
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 13:47:05 -0500
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
From: Alfred A. Skrocki[SMTP:alfred.skrocki@cybernetworking.com]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 1997 3:04 AM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: Magnetic quenched gaps
On Tuesday, September 16, 1997 6:01 PM Richard Hull
[SMTP:rhull@richmond.infi.net] wrote;
> >Dale,
>
> You need lotsa' gauss in a largish air gap for proper quench and thus this
> method is best used on smaller systems as a concept demonstration. The
> newer Ne:Fe:B magnets are far too heat sensitive to use near hot gap
> structures as they reach their curie point at very low temperature levels.
> Ferrite is a bit too weak and alnico a bit too expensive for assembling a
> really large and effective magnetic quench gaps system for a giant system.
So, why not use electro-magnets? I think electro-magnets still
produce a higher gauss per unit size than the best permanent magnets,
correct me if I'm wrong on that. The core could be made of a high
curie point feromagnetic alloy.
Sincerely
\\\|///
\\ ~ ~ //
( @ @ )
-----o00o-(_)-o00o-----
Alfred A. Skrocki
Alfred.Skrocki@CyberNetworking.com
.ooo0 0ooo.
-----( )---( )-----
\ ( ) /
\_) (_/