[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Hi Q Quest (was sync TC latest resul
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@poodle.pupman.com>
-
Subject: Re: Hi Q Quest (was sync TC latest resul
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 16:54:38 -0600
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
From: FutureT@aol.com [SMTP:FutureT@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 1997 10:48 AM
To: tesla@pupman.com
Subject: Re: Hi Q Quest (was sync TC latest resul
In a message dated 97-11-11 10:02:10 EST, you write:
<<
> ----->The Xc loading is different for the different frequencies
> is it not? What if you made the 17" coil a little longer to
> get the frequency down to 80 kHz (with the same top load)
> and then did the comparison?
> Barry
Barry,
It would seem that the freq. and L values I posted in original post
were incorrect; correct freq of the 4 1/4" by 23" coil is 135kHz,
L = 44mH. Sorry for the confustion. See my other post to you
also.
John Freau
>>