[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Optimal Quenching Tests
-
To: tesla@pupman.com
-
Subject: Re: Optimal Quenching Tests
-
From: Richard Hull <hullr@whitlock.com>
-
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 1997 16:23:34 -0800
-
Subscriber: hullr@whitlock.com Thu Jan 2 22:53:25 1997
Tesla List wrote:
>
> Subscriber: ed@alumni.caltech.edu Sun Dec 22 20:27:06 1996
> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 1996 17:16:30 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Edward V. Phillips" <ed@alumni.caltech.edu>
> To: tesla@pupman.com
> Subject: Re: Optimal Quenching Tests
>
> Re: "Fast quenching"
> The benefits were thoroughly understood back in spark
> transmitter days: they called it "impulse excitation" anede
> and advantages cited were tighter allowable coupling to the
> antenna circuit and avoidance of a "double wave".
> Ed
All,
Again, these old accepted and recognised "benefits" mentioned above are
for radio work, viewed from a radio enginering perspective, and may or
maynot impact us as coilers or our spark length.
Richard Hull, TCBOR