[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Secondary Frequency(fwd)
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@pupman.com>
-
Subject: Secondary Frequency(fwd)
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 23:45:37 -0500
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
----------
From: Michael Tucknott [SMTP:Michael.Tucknott@virgin.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 1998 2:46 PM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: Secondary Frequency(fwd)
Tesla List wrote:
>
> ----------
> From: terryf@verinet.com [SMTP:terryf@verinet.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 1998 11:41 PM
> To: tesla@pupman.com
> Subject: Re: Secondary Frequency(fwd)
>
> I just tallied the responses:
>
> Another Coiler 418kHz 275kHz
> Reinhard 200 200
> Mark S. Rzeszotarski 360 285
> John Couture 324.0 250.3
> Ed Sonderman 375 296
> Dave Sharp 393 310
> Bert Hickman 410-430 275-295
> Bart Anderson 367 290
>
> Perhaps if these coils are really built we would see who is closest! Or,
> perhaps it is better if we don't go there :-))
>
> Terry Fritz (who goes with Mark Rzeszotarski in such matters :-))
>
> At 01:30 AM 8/18/98 EDT, you wrote:
> >Hi to All,
> >
> >
> >Below are two given coils.
> >What is the frequency of each coil? Another coiler and I disagree on the
> >resonant frequency of these two coils. Can somebody help?
> >
> >Coil A:
> >21.7" long
> >3" diameter
> >Wound with 1230 feet AWG 28
> >He says 418kHz (I say 200 kHz)
> >
> >Coil B
> >10.84" long
> >6" diameter
> >Also wound with 1230 feet AWG 28
> >He says 275kHz (I say 200 kHz)
> >
> >Who is right??
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Reinhard
> >
> >
Hi Terry and all
First off I`m no expert at maths so can someone please tell me why there
were so many different answers.
I usued ED`s excel spred sheet and came up with
a different answer not far of the 375/296 but I think I had the
turns/Inch
figure incorect.
Cheers Mike Tucknott