[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Why a toroid?
-
To: tesla@pupman.com
-
Subject: Re: Why a toroid?
-
From: Tesla List <mod1@pupman.com>
-
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 13:09:04 -0600 (MDT)
-
Approved: mod1@poodle.pupman.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 10:51:55 -0500
From: "DR.RESONANCE" <DR.RESONANCE@next-wave.net>
To: Tesla List <tesla@pupman.com>
Subject: Re: Why a toroid?
To: Greg
Bill Wysock did back in the mid 1970's. It seemed to work fine but lacked
the large surface area of the torus.
DR.RESONANCE@next-wave.net
----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla@pupman.com>
> To: tesla@pupman.com
> Subject: Why a toroid?
> Date: Tuesday,October 07,1997 10:04 PM
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 19:04:16 +0000
> From: Greg Leyh <lod@pacbell.net>
> To: Tesla List <tesla@pupman.com>
> Subject: Why a toroid?
>
> A lot of effort has been directed at fabricating toroids for TC's.
> Has anyone ever tried using a large metal disk as the top electrode?
> A suitably sized disk would have just as much C to gnd as the toroid.
>
> I know that I should just try it myself, but I thought I'd ask first.
>
>
> -GL