[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Spark gap question - lurk apology
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@pupman.com>
-
Subject: Spark gap question - lurk apology
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 1998 23:36:08 -0600
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
From: Bert Pool[SMTP:bertpool@ticnet.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 1998 7:40 PM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: Spark gap question - lurk apology
Stainless steel has very poor heat conductivity, and the one person I
know who has tried s.s. said his gap fouled quickly. Brass also tens to
foul. Copper works better than anything else I've tried. I recommend
at least 2 inch diameter pipe, 2.5 inch is superb.
Bert Pool
>
>From: Bob Schumann[SMTP:tesla@america.com]
>Sent: Sunday, January 11, 1998 6:41 AM
>To: tesla@pupman.com
>Cc: USA-TESLA@list.iex.net
>Subject: Spark gap question - lurk apology
>
>Hi coilers,
>
>Sorry it has seemed like a millineum since I have posted and have been
>lurking to the side.Over the summer I have built a small coil and have
>desgined a spark gap, both of which I will be taking pictures of to put
>on my web page and share with the list.
>
>I recently came upon some inch and a half stainless steel cylinders I
was
>thinking if they would make good electrodes in a static spark gap
setup.
>I am wondering if anybody has tried stainless steel and if in fact
brass or
>copper would be a better electrode. The stainless steel cylinders are
>hardened which may prove to make them less then diserable but I don't
know.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Bob Schumann
>
>
>
>