[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Pri-Sec Phasing
-
To: tesla@pupman.com
-
Subject: Re: Pri-Sec Phasing
-
From: Tesla List <mod1@pupman.com>
-
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 1997 21:02:54 -0600 (MDT)
-
Approved: mod1@poodle.pupman.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 18:54:31 +0000
From: Greg Leyh <lod@pacbell.net>
To: Tesla List <tesla@pupman.com>
Subject: Re: Pri-Sec Phasing
Thomas McGahee wrote:
> Greg,
> I agree with Malcolm. If what the book said was true, then if you
> bifilar wound two primary coils and then connected the start of the
> windings together and then the endings together you would have a
> current flow between them due to their supposedly opposite
> polarities. But that just ain't so.
That is true, assuming both parallel filaments make up a primary
winding. But what if one filament was the primary(sourcing power),
and the other was the secondary(removing power)?
-GL