[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Modeling a magnifier
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@pupman.com>
-
Subject: Modeling a magnifier
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 18:25:08 -0600
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
----------
From: John H. Couture [SMTP:couturejh@worldnet.att.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 1998 4:57 PM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: Modeling a magnifier
At 07:57 AM 3/14/98 -0600, you wrote:
>
>----------
>From: richard hull [SMTP:rhull@richmond.infi.net]
>Sent: Friday, March 13, 1998 6:54 PM
>To: Tesla List
>Subject: Re: Modeling a magnifier
>
>At 09:54 AM 3/13/98 -0600, you wrote:
>>
>>----------
>>From: Malcolm Watts [SMTP:MALCOLM@directorate.wnp.ac.nz]
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 1998 6:12 PM
>>To: Tesla List
>>Subject: Re: Modeling a magnifier
>snip
>>>
>>> You can learn a lot about dampened waves using a spreadsheet with graphing
>>> capabilities such as Quattro Pro, etc. Just superimpose the two waveforms at
>>> the same frequency on the graph and you will see many differences between
>>> the two waveforms.
>
>
>>
>>I venture to suggest I have learnt far more by building and running
>>systems and observing all facets of their behaviour in considerable
>>detail using high powered instrumentation such as storage scopes and
>>the like.
>>
>>Malcolm
>>
>Good man Malcolm..........
>
>R Hull, TCBOR
-----------------------------------------------------
Richard, Malcolm -
Please do not think I am trying to put less importance on the excellent
work you two have done with Tesla coils. I am only trying to add to the
information you have provided.
I was particularly attracted by the discovery that the peak of the
dampened wave lagged the typical sine wave. I thought this was something you
were not aware of and may want to explore the possibilities as far as
synchronous gaps are concerned.
John Couture