[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Spark Gap Design Alternatives (fwd)
-
To: tesla@pupman.com
-
Subject: Re: Spark Gap Design Alternatives (fwd)
-
From: Tesla List <mod1@pupman.com>
-
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 21:03:35 -0700 (MST)
-
Approved: mod1@poodle.pupman.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 01:10:48 GMT
From: Jim & Dala Florey <beagle@prairie.lakes.com>
To: Tesla List <mod1@pupman.com>
Subject: Re: Spark Gap Design Alternatives (fwd)
At 10:26 PM 2/22/97 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Sat, 22 Feb 1997 11:28:52 -0500 (EST)
>From: SSNSanders@aol.com
>To: testla@pupman.com
>Subject: Re: Spark Gap Design Alternatives (fwd)
>
>In a message dated 97-02-21 01:30:01 EST, you write:
>
><<
> There would be 6 copper or brass disks, each about 1 inch diameter and 1
> inch long, all in a line, thus forming 5 gaps (visualize as a sliced
> salami). >>
>snipsnip
I have a book titaled "Practical wireless telegraphy" by Elmer E. Bucher
from 1917 in the days or spark transmitters.
It is very informative, and it has some drawings and text describing a
quenched gap
very simular to what you are suggesting. If you are interested I could post
something.
I'll be away for a few days and can not recieve my mail till tue. but after
that?
Jim Florey Jr.
beagle@prairie.lakes.com