[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Conditions for opt. loading, was: In vs. Out
-
To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla@poodle.pupman.com>
-
Subject: Re: Conditions for opt. loading, was: In vs. Out
-
From: Tesla List <tesla@stic.net>
-
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 08:21:36 -0500
-
Approved: tesla@stic.net
From: John H. Couture[SMTP:couturejh@worldnet.att.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 1997 2:58 AM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: Conditions for opt. loading, was: In vs. Out
At 03:44 AM 7/31/97 +0000, you wrote:
>
>From: Malcolm Watts[SMTP:MALCOLM@directorate.wnp.ac.nz]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 1997 10:27 PM
>To: tesla@pupman.com
>Subject: Re: Conditions for opt. loading, was: In vs. Out
>
>Hi John
> I could write a book on it. Perhaps the best way is to try it
>single shot, then try it for the running coil. The lengths are
>different as you have energy stored in the discharge channel/ion
>cloud for the repetitive situation and I've found under this
>condition, optimal loading occurs with longer sparks than sshot.
> It is kind of difficult to elaborate further without giving an
>actual demonstration (which I would dearly love to be able to do).
>
>Malcolm
>
>-------------------------------------------------
Malcolm -
Don't write a book on spark length. No one on the T.List would agree with you.
How about a book on TC efficiency. This is basic engineering, input vs output.
We already have an electronic wattmeter (D. Sharpe) to do the job.
John Couture
>
>