[TCML] Spark gap Resistance
Barton B. Anderson
bartb at classictesla.com
Mon Nov 19 19:27:53 MST 2007
You mean Bert. When it comes to spark physics, Bert is "the" man!
Take care,
Bart
David N. Van Doren wrote:
> Thank you very much gentlemen.
> Bart there's enough info there to do a thesis!
> I know full and well about the difficulties of modeling plasma, I
> guess I was hoping that someone arrived at a suitable approximation. I
> don't look for exact numbers when I model TC's because of the
> uncertnty of the spark gap and load. I look for trends and approximate
> magnitudes. but I'm seeing something that doesn't make sense, which
> I'll start a different thread about.
> I guess I'll just have to do some ringdown tests with the oscope and
> compare damp down rate and notches and back approximate.
> BTW the difference between using 1,2,3 or 4 ohms for a spark gap is big.
> Until I read about the 220k-1.5pf/ft approximation, I had
> arrived at ~2Meg
> parallel to C2.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David N. Van Doren"
> <DNVanDoren at comcast.net>
> To: <tesla at pupman.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 10:43 AM
> Subject: [TCML] Spark gap Resistance
>
>
> Does anyone have any data on spark gap resistance?
> and for that matter Streamer impedance?
> I've been doing some simulations, and for the lack of any better
> number I've been using 4 ohms for spark gap R's and have tried using
> 220kohm+1.5pf'/ft for streamers, but doesn't always seem to look right
> in the sims. Trying to characterize plasma is always difficult at best.
>
> Thanks
>
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla at www.pupman.com
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla at www.pupman.com
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
>
>
>
More information about the Tesla
mailing list