[TCML] MMC saftey gap
Gary Lau
glau1024 at gmail.com
Mon Mar 28 05:54:00 MST 2011
The MMC should NOT have a safety gap in parallel with it. A safety gap in
parallel with a cap will subject the cap to extremely high discharge
currents.
Instead, the safety gap should be in parallel with the main gap - static or
rotary. Wired in this way, the safety gap will achieve the same function -
limiting the cap voltage, but should it discharge, the discharge current
will be limited by the primary inductance. And the safety gap is a just a
simple two-terminal gap.
Regards, Gary Lau
MA, USA
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 11:25 PM, John Contovasilis <
jlcontovasilis at gmail.com> wrote:
> Does the saftey gap for the MMC array have to have a third electrode that
> is
> grounded like the safty gap in the NST filter?
> _______________________________________________
> Tesla mailing list
> Tesla at pupman.com
> http://www.pupman.com/mailman/listinfo/tesla
>
More information about the Tesla
mailing list