[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Voltage Reversal of Pulse Caps
-
To: tesla@grendel.objinc.com, KLINEDA@univscvm.csd.scarolina.edu, QUANTUM@univscvm.csd.scarolina.edu, WMEYER@scientia.up.ac.za, bhaley@shore.net, frerichs@zfe.siemens.de, froula@cig.mot.com, haba@snakemail.hut.fi, jetter@ix.netcom.com, scott@csustan.csustan.edu
-
Subject: Re: Voltage Reversal of Pulse Caps
-
From: Esondrmn@aol.com
-
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 13:06:32 -0500
-
>Received: from mail04.mail.aol.com (mail04.mail.aol.com [152.163.172.53]) by uucp-1.csn.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id LAA27110 for <tesla@grendel.objinc.com>; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 11:09:35 -0700
In a message dated 95-11-28 04:02:41 EST, tesla@grendel.objinc.com writes:
>Now, someone posted much higher figures on the shot life ratings of these
>caps.
>I don't remember who it was. It could have been Ed Sonderman. Was it you
>Ed?
>These shot life figures are open for interpretation. I am awaiting a call
>from
>Condenser Products now to discuss this matter further. We don't really use
>them
>the way that this test indicates. I'll let you know of my findings.
>
>
Scott,
Yes, I did reply on this a week or two ago. I believe the number they gave
me was 3.5 x 10 to the 12th for shot life.
Ed Sonderman