[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: Spheres vs Toriods
-
To: tesla <tesla-at-grendel.objinc-dot-com>
-
Subject: RE: Spheres vs Toriods
-
From: Richard Hull <whitlock-dot-com!RICHARDH-at-uucp-1.csn-dot-net>
-
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 96 17:19:00 PDT
-
>Received: from valriva.whitlock-dot-com (valriva.whitlock-dot-com [198.69.64.3]) by uucp-1.csn-dot-net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA28714 for <grendel!grendel.objinc-dot-com!tesla-at-uucp-1.csn-dot-net>; Mon, 8 Apr 1996 15:20:56 -0600
-
Encoding: 91 TEXT
Marcus,
Your final point about the plastic spreader is ok. As long as the toroid
overhangs the winding of the coil you should be OK, The field control only
relys on the donut portion. The web or spreader does act to even the field
out a bit, mainly by providing a smooth even field in the center of the
toroidal plane. It is not required on stacked toroids at all as this area
is seal off. I still prefer the lower toroid in a stack to have a metallic
web.
One fianl note. The use of a plastic web, which is a dielectric, might
support and retain a nasty charge in very dry weather after the coil is off,
so be careful.
Richard Hull, TCBOR
----------
From: tesla
To: 73041.2215; 73663.1536; BrittB7556; JHERRON; JOHNBATES3; abourass;
atech; av599; davide; funkadelic; jbiehler; jmonty; kg7bz; koppemha; logue;
mackte; nwtnmike; osburnw; pinsky; richardh; rmessick; rnicker; rwstephens;
shu95mmc; stevej; twill19; yiorgos
Subject: RE: Spheres vs Toriods
Date: Monday, April 08, 1996 1:02PM