Re: Arc length vs pwrRe: Arc length vs pwrRE: Arc length vs pwrRe: Arc length vs pwr

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Arc length vs pwrRe: Arc length vs pwrRE: Arc length vs pwrRe: Arc length vs pwr
• From: GE Leyh <lod-at-pacbell-dot-net>
• Date: Mon, 09 Oct 1995 20:28:36 +0000

Richard Hull wrote:
 
> Example:  1000 watts input energy
> watts remaining:
>                                 best case       worst case
> Transformation                  980 watts       960 watts
> ballasting                      882             864
> Tank/switching                  794             648
> coupling                        119             97
> secondary                       113             92


Interesting figures.  I'm not sure that I'm reading this chart correctly.
Is this chart stating that over half of the total losses occur in the
primary and spark gap (794-119 = 675 Watts, best case)?

• Prev: Re: Tank frequency
• Next: Re: Spice simulation pictures
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread