Re: Optimal Quenching Tests

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: Optimal Quenching Tests
• From: Ed Harris <harris-at-parkave-dot-net>
• Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 00:28:20 -0500
• Subscriber: harris-at-parkave-dot-net Fri Feb 7 00:37:20 1997

    [The following text is in the "ISO-8859-1" character set]
    [Your display is set for the "US-ASCII" character set]
    [Some characters may be displayed incorrectly]


> Subscriber: rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net Tue Feb  4 22:36:30 1997
> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 22:31:32 -0500 (EST)
> From: richard hull <rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Optimal Quenching Tests

> >Subscriber: FutureT-at-aol-dot-com Mon Feb  3 21:16:18 1997
> >Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 20:34:11 -0500 (EST)
> >From: FutureT-at-aol-dot-com
> >To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> >Cc: bert.hickman-at-aquila-dot-com
> >Subject: Re: Optimal Quenching Tests
> >
>>And thanks Bert for all your
> >info and for being persistent in the matter, and your PSPICE data seems
> >vindicated.  And thanks to the other list members who commented on this
> >matter.

> >John Freau  
> >  
> >
> >
> John,
> 
> Gee whiz, I talked to Lou two days ago and he didn't mention this!  This
is
> real neat!  With the high coupling, the quench had to come well before
the
> first beat at 1.5us!!! (92khz=~5us/half cycle)  Not even I would have
> guessed at this one.  I thought at least one half cycle of the wave would
be
> needed.  This is amazing news, but might open a can of worms with the mag
> field theorists. 

> Richard Hull, TCBOR

Looks like a boon to the theorists (BERT) to me. Circuit theory is verified

by Lou's experiment, no?

-Ed Harris

• Prev: Re: Explanation of the positive E.S. charge
• Next: Re: Top Toroid +Ayrton Equation
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread