Re: TC Electrostatics (fwd)

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: TC Electrostatics (fwd)
• From: lod-at-pacbell-dot-net
• Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 21:31:10 -0800
• Subscriber: lod-at-pacbell-dot-net Sat Jan 4 21:53:00 1997

Tesla List wrote:

> > Isn't Ohm's law at work here as well?  I am convinced that if you replace
> > the 100 ft wire with a (non-conductive) 100 ft string, that the apparatus
> > will not work.
> >
> > -GL
> 
> You are correct!  But, this is only due to the nature and place of metal
> in the "electrostatic series" of materials!  It is dead center.  It is
> totally neutral.  It is conductive of electrostatic charge and I'm not
> talking about the dynamic currents of ohms law.  Electrostatic charge can
> travel along the surface of a conductor/dielctric interface without
> ever entering it!!!!  I have done the experiment!  
[snip]

Can you describe this experiment in greater detail?  I am still convinced
that stationary charge is the same quantity as moving charge.

-GL

• Prev: Re: TC Electrostatics (fwd)
• Next: Re: Oil filed magnifier drivers
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread