[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Experimental results
Tesla List wrote:
>
> Subscriber: rwall-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com Fri Dec 20 23:00:48 1996
> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 10:45:14 -0800
> From: Richard Wayne Wall <rwall-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com>
> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
> Subject: Re: Experimental results
>
> Bert wrote:
>
> >> RH wrote:
> >>
> >> snip
> >>
> >> >It was only in this series of tests that I have now verified, as
> >> >Richard Wayne Wall has, that....
> >> >
> >> > The collected charge on an isotropic capacity in the vacinity of a
> >> >air discharging Tesla coil is always POSITIVE!
> >> >
> >> >This has been verified now by three hundred year old instruments
> and a
> >> >modern electrometer.
> >>
> >> snip
> >>
> >> Polarity is not an issue. As noted before, there are many known and
> >> unknown indepedant variables with these TC systems. The real issue
> is
> >> that an electrostatic charge may be deposited on a receiver by a TC.
> >> Hopefully, research in this area will reveal the mechanism.
> >>
> >> RWW
> >
> >But the polarity probably provides clues to the mechanism...
> >
> >-- Bert --
> >
>
> 12/20/96
>
> Bert, all
>
> Polarity is of secondary interest. Polarity really is a dependant
> variable and provides no clue at all to the mechanism of a TC
> depositing an electrostatic charge on a target. Please see RH's post
> "New Experiments" on 12/19/96 where he deposited a negative charge on a
> receiver with a small tube coil.
>
> Electron and ion charge carriers are also unlikely. Their energy and
> free mean path is very limited at one atm and these potentials.
>
> RWW
Richard,
I think charge is of key concern!!! Most notably the inability of any
thing I did with a DC or AC supply and internal coil re-wiring to reverse
it! What gives? The charge polarity may be at the core of the issue.
Richard Hull, TCBOR