[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Hi Q Quest (was sync TC latest resul
From: FutureT-at-aol-dot-com [SMTP:FutureT-at-aol-dot-com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 1997 10:35 AM
To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: Re: Hi Q Quest (was sync TC latest resul
In a message dated 97-11-11 10:02:10 EST, you write:
<<
>> It would seem that a certain
>> amount of input power can power up only a certain amount of
>> combined isotropic capacity within the secondary/toroid combo,
>> i.e. a small secondary can tolerate a large toroid, but a physically
>> large secondary cannot, at these power levels.
>> Regards,
>> John Freau"
> ----->The Xc loading is different for the different frequencies
> is it not? What if you made the 17" coil a little longer to
> get the frequency down to 80 kHz (with the same top load)
> and then did the comparison?
> Barry
>>
Barry,
Hmmm, I'd have to get a new form, or add some sort of extension
to my existing form. I have 3 secondaries; one is 6 1/2" by 23", #28,
80kHz, gives 42" spark with small toroid, and 44"? spark with
the large toroid. Another sec. is 4 1/4" by 23" , #28, 130 kHz, gives
40" spark with small toroid, and 46" spark with large toroid. And
third sec. is 17" by 17", #24, 110kHz, gives 42" with small toroid,
and 44" with large toroid. Does this all fit your scenario concerning
the Xc issue?
John Freau