[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Greg and Golka (Twins separated at birth?) Nope.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 23:49:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: richard hull <rhull-at-richmond.infi-dot-net>
To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
Subject: Re: Greg and Golka (Twins separated at birth?) Nope.
At 08:55 PM 10/8/97 -0600, you wrote:
>
>
>---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 19:56:37 -0400
>From: Thomas McGahee <tom_mcgahee-at-sigmais-dot-com>
>To: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>Subject: Greg and Golka (Twins separated at birth?) Nope.
>
>
>
>----------
>> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
>> To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
>> Subject: Why a toroid?
>> Date: Tuesday, October 07, 1997 11:04 PM
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>Greg,
>I know I already posted some stuff on this topic, but it just struck
>me: you are not like many of the people on this list (myself
>included) that run with under-powered coils. If you pump enough power
>in, yeah, you're going to lose some of that to corona, but the rest
>of it is going to come streaming out in arcs. So don't let any
>negative comments I or others may have made prevent you from trying
>this out. You are operating in a different league than most of us.
>The rules are slightly different when you are pumping 100 KW in,
>versus just a couple of kilowatts. Damn the corona leaks! Full speed
>ahead! You are in a different league not JUST because you are
>bigger. Golka was bigger, too, but that's where the resemblance
>stops. No one would confuse the two of you. Or your coils...
>
>I remember looking at one of Richard Hull's video tapes where he
>discussed Golka's massive coil. (Tim Raney gave me a whole box of
>video tapes, and I spent several days spending every available moment
>watching them all. Thanks, Tim!) Anyway, Golka's coil can only be
>described as being a very large -at-!#*&%#. To put it mildly. It was a
>true monstrousity. It was cobbled together from all kinds of odds and
>ends. It was truly ugly. It looked awful. But it worked.
>
>Golka pumped so much power into the darn thing that it didn't have
>any other choice *but* to work. If it's a double tuned resonant
>circuit and you excite it with enough of that electrical stuff, it
>spits out sparks. Clobber it with a bazillion KW and it spits out
>really BIG *A*R*C*S*. Golka's coil was really *B*A*D*. Aesthetically,
>it is one of the worst things I have ever seen. Someone on this list
>posted something once saying that Golka used ceramic toilets as his
>HV insulators. I barf at the thought. But it worked.
>
>By the way, Richard Hull, if you are reading this post, maybe for our
>edification (we can all use a good laugh) you can tell us all some
>more of the gory details of this truly monstrous coil. Not every one
>on the list has seen the video, and I think the facts about Golka's
>coil are a real hoot! And it worked! (More than I can say for one or
>two of *my* coils).
>
>Still chuckling in Paterson,
>Fr. Tom McGahee
>
>Tom, all,
Golka's coil was an absolute carbon copy of Tesla's Colorado system down to
the wire size and the last inch of diameter and height. It would perform no
better than Tesla's system in Colorado in 1899. Like Tom said, Golka did
throw about 150 KW into the system. (far more than Tesla did) His system
did better than Tesla's due to the increased power input. Telsa had OK
capacitors.... Golka had superb units. Both had terrible rotary spark gap
systems for the coupling coefficent used. (~ K=.6)
Golka used a buzz saw blade from a saw mill! (many teeth with little or no
rest interval) He also used a series connected sulfer hex quench gap which
at this power level must have remained sulfur hex for less than a second!
Golka's work goes back to the early/mid 70's when his first exact replica
Colorado system was actually set up on the salt flats outdoors!!! He did
use commodes to raise and insulate the primary system from the rebared floor
of the aircraft hangar.
There are more details which I would not care to comment on in this forum.
Richard Hull, TCBOR