[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A Puzzle
From: DR.RESONANCE[SMTP:DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net]
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 1997 10:01 PM
To: Tesla List
Subject: Re: A Puzzle
To: Rich Wall
Theory or not withstanding, it has come to within 2% of actual measured
value and that works well enough for our purposes. For exacting research
work, I agree, it is not accurate enough.
DR.RESONANCE-at-next-wave-dot-net
----------
> From: Tesla List <tesla-at-pupman-dot-com>
> To: 'Tesla List' <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
> Subject: Re: A Puzzle
> Date: Saturday,September 06,1997 6:03 PM
>
>
> From: Richard Wayne Wall[SMTP:rwall-at-ix-dot-netcom-dot-com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 06, 1997 5:29 AM
> To: Tesla List
> Subject: Re: A Puzzle
>
> Dr. R. wrote:
>
> snip
>
> >The peak current in amps can easily be determined by measuring the
> >total capacitance of the machine. Divide the in coulombs by the time
> >in sec (assume 1 microsec for most machines) and this gives the total
> >peak current in amperes.
>
> snip
>
> Unfortunately, your method is severely flawed. There was a long thread
> on the the interconverability of electrostatic coulombs and EM coulombs
> this last year. The original experimental method proposing to connect
> the two is severely lacking. R. Hull has written elegant posts in this
> regard. You may refer to the archives or perhaps Richard may choose to
> comment on this old information.
>
> RWW
>
>