Re: New Testing

• To: "'Tesla List'" <tesla-at-poodle.pupman-dot-com>
• Subject: Re: New Testing
• From: Tesla List <tesla-at-stic-dot-net>
• Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 23:44:02 -0500
• Approved: tesla-at-stic-dot-net

From: 	Esondrmn-at-aol-dot-com[SMTP:Esondrmn-at-aol-dot-com]
Sent: 	Friday, September 12, 1997 8:41 AM
To: 	tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
Subject: 	Re: New Testing

In a message dated 97-09-12 09:31:19 EDT, you write:

<< > 
 > After I shut the system down for the night, I checked the rotary gap
 > carefully and found the gap between the stainless steel acorn nuts on the
 > polycarb disc and the fixed (2) tungsten electrodes to be a bit wider than
I
 > would like.  The disc doesn't run perfectly true so I need a bit more gap
 > than I would like.  The total was probably about .150 to .200".  I closed
it
 > down as close as possible without it hitting.  The total gap now is
probably
 > .100" plus the three .030 static gaps for maybe .190" total.  Will the
system
 > be this sensitive to gap distance setting?
 > 
 > Anyone have any ideas?
 > 
 > Thanks,  Ed Sonderman
 > 
 Ed,
 
 Where you running a mains synchronous rotary and by chance did you 
 somehow do something to disturb the 60 Hz mains phase angle of points 
 presentation?
 
 rwstephens
  >>
No, the rotary is a standard non synchronous variety.

Ed Sonderman

• Prev: Re: Tesla Coil Document Now Available
• Next: Re: New Testing
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread