[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: Magnetic quenched gaps




From: 	Alfred A. Skrocki[SMTP:alfred.skrocki-at-cybernetworking-dot-com]
Sent: 	Wednesday, September 17, 1997 8:54 AM
To: 	Tesla List
Subject: 	Re: Magnetic quenched gaps

On Tuesday, September 16, 1997 6:32 PM Dale F. Pfaffle
[SMTP:pfaffle-at-tele-net-dot-net] wrote;

> Being new here this may have been discussed before but, I have not seen
> anyone mention quenching with a magnetic field.  Are they not very good, to
> hard to tune/maintain, or the other methods are just better.
> Thanks,


Incredible! I was honestly just thinking of opening up the subject of 
magnetic quenching, while reading todays messages, and here you 
went and beat me to the punch! I suspect we hear so little about 
magnetic quenching because it is not as well understood as the less
subtle rotary gaps or stationary gaps with a fan. I don't know if 
anyone has ever done any serious work to compare a magnetically 
quenched gap to a fan quenched stationary gap or a rotary. I always 
liked the subtlety of the magnetically quenched gap though. I was 
going to ask if anyone out there is currently playing with magnetic 
quenching.

			       Sincerely

                                \\\|///
			      \\  ~ ~  //
                               (  -at- -at-  )
                        -----o00o-(_)-o00o-----
                           Alfred A. Skrocki
                   Alfred.Skrocki-at-CyberNetworking-dot-com
                             .ooo0   0ooo.
                        -----(   )---(   )-----
                              \ (     ) /
                               \_)   (_/