Re: 60 bps sync operation (new tests)

• To: tesla-at-pupman-dot-com
• Subject: Re: 60 bps sync operation (new tests)
• From: "Malcolm Watts" <malcolm.watts-at-wnp.ac.nz> (by way of Terry Fritz <twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net>)
• Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 06:13:16 -0600
• Approved: twftesla-at-uswest-dot-net
• Delivered-To: fixup-tesla-at-pupman-dot-com-at-fixme

Hi John,

> Original Poster: FutureT-at-aol-dot-com 
 
<snip>
> In any case, these tests show once again that 60 bps and
> 120 bps are about equal in spark growth efficiency.  It's possible that
> there's a break-rate in between (such as 80 or 100 bps) that's even
> better at these (and other?) power levels.
> 
> I once tried 30 bps, but the results were NG.  This break rate is
> probably too low for spark streamer coalescence in this TC.
> 
> This 60 bps work is a part of my efforts to see which break rates
> are most efficient at producing long sparks.  I'm not recommending
> that anyone actually use 60 bps for their TC's.
> 
> Cheers,
> John Freau

I'm pretty much stuck with 100BPS with static gaps and a 50Hz mains. 
It goes very well on the large coil I have at work.

Cheers,
Malcolm

• Prev: Re: Transformr sources in the UK
• Next: new secondary
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread